IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Wed, 06 October 2010 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DC13A6F51 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiD9MqEhwoOT for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8419C3A6B41 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o96EH022019811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:17:00 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o96EH0Sx031062; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:17:00 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:17:00 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:16:59 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64010A8CB6@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <201010061330.o96DU1o1014393@idle.juniper.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt
Thread-Index: ActlXZryj/Yju2PwSMeKeIdFlCSKDAAAzSDg
References: <20101006134329.GA54263@elstar.local> <201010061330.o96DU1o1014393@idle.juniper.net>
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: ext Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2010 14:17:00.0344 (UTC) FILETIME=[242E5380:01CB6561]
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:16:04 -0000

> From: ext Phil Shafer [mailto:phil@juniper.net]
> Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:
> >Since the document in question defines a protocol that carries XML,
> >having this reference may seem different from requiring a reference
to
> >the YANG guidelines how to write a YANG proper module in every YANG
> >module. At least in the SMIv2 space, we managed to live without it.
> 
> Are we talking about putting a reference to yang-usage in the
> netconf-bis just to say that the new yang module follows those
> guidelines?

draft-ietf-netmod-yang-usage-11 has important guideline on 
namespace registration, YANG module registration, etc., which 
are used in 4741bis.

Mehmet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email