IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sun, 03 October 2010 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F180A3A6E89 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHrEY9iq+gVr for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8653A6DB0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C81EC0004; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:56:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTjkX2bFIIDH; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:56:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62980C0002; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:56:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3F4EF1503A83; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:55:40 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Message-ID: <20101003205540.GA16936@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <CB69B162C87647AE97AB749466633F54@BertLaptop> <4C9B3E60.5030000@bwijnen.net> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640106532D@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <20101003172455.GA16616@elstar.local> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640106533B@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640106533B@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:55:20 -0000

On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:42:25PM +0200, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> > > Section 9. Security Considerations
> > >
> > > I would suggest to add a few sentences for the EOM handling
> > > and the possible thread concerning section 3. It would be
> > > interesting to recommend a possible reaction if this happens
> > > frequently, e.g. to drop the NETCONF session.
> > 
> > 4741bis does not have an EOM marker - so how can we discuss it in
> > the security considerations?
> 
> EOM handling is for sure not part of NETCONF but the possible 
> thread concerning EOM handling is. I think security considerations 
> section should discuss the related security thread, as we did on 
> NETCONF ML with a long mail thread.

There is no EOM issue if you run NETCONF over BEEP. We should stick to
modularity and discuss things where they belong. Perhaps you want
different text than the one I currently image you want...

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email