[netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8572 (6690)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 22 September 2021 08:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70283A0BA6 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 127kKTqiK9Jy for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE9E3A0B97 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D82D8F40768; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: kent+ietf@watsen.net, ian.farrer@telekom.de, mikael.abrahamsson@t-systems.se, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: alexkri@asocscloud.com, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210922085819.D82D8F40768@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:58:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/C8tvd141UdPtXkSWEjTXt7c8usQ>
Subject: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8572 (6690)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:58:30 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8572, "Secure Zero Touch Provisioning (SZTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6690 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alex Krichevsky <alexkri@asocscloud.com> Section: 8.1 Original Text ------------- The DHCPv4 server MAY include a single instance of the OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT option in DHCP messages it sends. Servers MUST NOT send more than one instance of the OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT option. Corrected Text -------------- The DHCPv4 server MAY include OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT in DHCP messages it sends. Notes ----- The original text contradicts the statement in the same section: "If the length of the 'bootstrap-server-list' field is too large to fit into a single option, then OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT MUST be split into multiple instances of the option according to the process described in [RFC3396]." Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8572 (draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Secure Zero Touch Provisioning (SZTP) Publication Date : April 2019 Author(s) : K. Watsen, I. Farrer, M. Abrahamsson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8572 (66… RFC Errata System