[netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC8572 (6684)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 22 September 2021 09:07 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5363A0AD1; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 02:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8araRYSKxXS; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 02:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DC23A0E94; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 02:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1EC1AF40766; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 02:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: alexkri@asocscloud.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, ian.farrer@telekom.de, mikael.abrahamsson@t-systems.se
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210922090747.1EC1AF40766@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 02:07:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/cp1HOBSu5YUpche7Mkq7T2F_3B8>
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC8572 (6684)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:07:57 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8572, "Secure Zero Touch Provisioning (SZTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6684 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Alex Krichevsky <alexkri@asocscloud.com> Date Reported: 2021-09-14 Verified by: Rob Wilton (IESG) Section: 8.1 Original Text ------------- The DHCPv4 server MAY include a single instance of the OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT option in DHCP messages it sends. Servers MUST NOT send more than one instance of the OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT option. Corrected Text -------------- The DHCPv4 server MAY include OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT in DHCP messages it sends. Notes ----- The original text contradicts the statement in the same section: "If the length of the 'bootstrap-server-list' field is too large to fit into a single option, then OPTION_V4_SZTP_REDIRECT MUST be split into multiple instances of the option according to the process described in [RFC3396]." -------------------------------------- RFC8572 (draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Secure Zero Touch Provisioning (SZTP) Publication Date : April 2019 Author(s) : K. Watsen, I. Farrer, M. Abrahamsson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC8572 (6684) RFC Errata System