Re: [netconf] [IANA #1354088] expert review for draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server (xml-registry)

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kent,

I was more talking about the difference between the iana- and ietf- prefixes on the module names.  It implies a difference in authority that I'm not sure follows for the iana- modules.  Yes, IANA is the source, but the module is still an IETF product...

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, at 06:10, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>
>> On Jan 29, 2024, at 9:59 PM, Martin Thomson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> LGTM.  I was thrown by the use of both ...:ns:yang:ietf-... and  ...:ns:yang:iana-... but the usage at least appears to be consistent.
>
> Please note that 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-06#section-4.9 
> says:
>
> 	A standard namespace statement value SHOULD have the following form:
>
> 	    <URN prefix string>:<module-name>
>
> 	The following URN prefix string SHOULD be used for published and 
> unpublished YANG modules:
>
> 	    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:
>
>
> Kent
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024, at 13:31, David Dong via RT wrote:
>>> Dear Tim and Martin (cc: netconf WG),
>>> 
>>> As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the 
>>> proposed registrations in draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-35 for 
>>> us? Please see:
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server/
>>> 
>>> The due date is February 13th.
>>> 
>>> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, 
>>> we'll make the registration at:
>>> 
>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/
>>> 
>>> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the 
>>> first response we receive.
>>> 
>>> With thanks,
>>> 
>>> David Dong
>>> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netconf mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf