IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (7866)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 23 March 2024 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03295C14F5FB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rjKoluTtwqdl for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7354CC151073 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 33A49E6634; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: andy@yumaworks.com, mbj@tail-f.com, kwatsen@juniper.net, warren@kumari.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: andy@yumaworks.com, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240323173810.33A49E6634@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:38:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/HTi5G7a8SwyRO3QyyaA8KGO4978>
Subject: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (7866)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:38:15 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040,
"RESTCONF Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7866

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>

Section: 3.5.3

Original Text
-------------
Text occurs in two places

1)

      The leaf-list value is specified as a string, using the canonical
      representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
      MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of
      [RFC3986].


2)

      The key value is specified as a string, using the canonical
      representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
      MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of
      [RFC3986]. 


Corrected Text
--------------

1)

      The leaf-list value is specified as a string, using the canonical
      representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
      MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of
      [RFC3986].

2)

      The key value is specified as a string, using the canonical
      representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
      MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of
      [RFC3986]. 


Notes
-----
The reserved character list is defined in section 2.2 of RFC 3986

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RESTCONF Protocol
Publication Date    : January 2017
Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Configuration
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email