Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (7866)

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:25 AM Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Kent/Andy,
>
> Should I reject the Errata so it can be filed again?
>
>
I guess so -- I don't think there is any way to edit this one

Andy


> On Mar 27, 2024, at 8:54 AM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> This errata is incomplete.
> The issue occurs three times.
> The occurrence in Section 5.1 is missing.
>
> K.
>
>
> On Mar 23, 2024, at 1:38 PM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040,
> "RESTCONF Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7866
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 3.5.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Text occurs in two places
>
> 1)
>
>     The leaf-list value is specified as a string, using the canonical
>     representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
>     MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of
>     [RFC3986].
>
>
> 2)
>
>     The key value is specified as a string, using the canonical
>     representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
>     MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of
>     [RFC3986].
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
> 1)
>
>     The leaf-list value is specified as a string, using the canonical
>     representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
>     MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of
>     [RFC3986].
>
> 2)
>
>     The key value is specified as a string, using the canonical
>     representation for the YANG data type.  Any reserved characters
>     MUST be percent-encoded, according to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 of
>     [RFC3986].
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The reserved character list is defined in section 2.2 of RFC 3986
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RESTCONF Protocol
> Publication Date    : January 2017
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
>
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>