IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: (with COMMENT)

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Tue, 27 February 2024 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018debdd1817-879f1d77-d37f-45f8-964a-5ec94d50b246-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A31FC14F680; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:39:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TE97LWI6yi1; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a8-33.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-33.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBA5C14F714; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:39:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1709059152; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=Vnhbtg9izJS1gkSaXEhnFu80xVS1A8ImjJtnhs9n/HQ=; b=YrWFy+WuoVYVAVXIh4OrEBPder/fStQj9tJyCmex3c/zv7kyTjBW/d1+ubFXw4OR hFIPUFUftNUGRvB/wdnCJ9wOVes7zwRzQm4sMXbzcOVYqHxMZh5CvBmD6ClAtHjlOGE N0eBepGHMAUJDmYvoEeqbl3cGotWjsIH6G2Rn8fs=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100018debdd1817-879f1d77-d37f-45f8-964a-5ec94d50b246-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_378DBD62-A913-4465-80B4-63A4AC81F109"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:39:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <170897152862.29027.11661109878525831837@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server@ietf.org, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "Per Andersson (perander)" <perander@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
References: <170897152862.29027.11661109878525831837@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.02.27-54.240.8.33
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/LZFQzbhkaoVWGQzRLB0agGRJXU0>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:39:16 -0000

Hi Martin,

Thank you for your review!
One comment below.

Kent  // author

> On Feb 26, 2024, at 1:18 PM, Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks to Michael Tuexen for the TSVART review.
> 
> I support Eric's DISCUSS about support for HTTP CONNECT proxies, though I think
> MASQUE itself is not relevant here.

In my reply to Éric, I explain that "HTTP connect proxy" is defined in the "http-client-server" draft.

This because "HTTP connect proxy” is used only to proxy HTTP connections (not generic TCP connections)

Makes sense?


> Nit:
> (2.1.5) s/not universally accepted/not universally deployed? adopted? activated?
> 
> Accepted seems like an imprecise word here.

I replaced with the word “implemented”.


Thanks again!
Kent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email