Re: [netconf] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

SGTM, thanks

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:39 AM Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank you for your review!
> One comment below.
>
> Kent  // author
>
> On Feb 26, 2024, at 1:18 PM, Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Michael Tuexen for the TSVART review.
>
> I support Eric's DISCUSS about support for HTTP CONNECT proxies, though I
> think
> MASQUE itself is not relevant here.
>
>
> In my reply to Éric, I explain that "HTTP connect proxy" is defined in the
> "http-client-server" draft.
>
> This because "HTTP connect proxy” is used only to proxy HTTP connections
> (not generic TCP connections)
>
> Makes sense?
>
>
> Nit:
> (2.1.5) s/not universally accepted/not universally deployed? adopted?
> activated?
>
> Accepted seems like an imprecise word here.
>
>
> I replaced with the word “implemented”.
>
>
> Thanks again!
> Kent
>
>
>