Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription

"duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com> Tue, 11 August 2020 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6199D3A0EAC for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <PfOH0dg_JU1Z>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfOH0dg_JU1Z for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qq.com (out203-205-221-249.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7F33A0EA6 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1597110033; bh=GOLs3bBIRp55PVEBpYGtgrd0g+/Xs38iPgKMiGyau5M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=A7mnEVlkq9gZ1Khf/z3tsu45xxDZvTPQIiSP16Ge90A4TBaYBvBdCIWjyWUWqGSyT WLFkCYiEt6VVFg1k8Lq9vfK+LS582/baJQVndFgxiHetD5SosgYPx0Ib15M/nypUNJ QXblUF38dqgV8pcuEU+o5vR3V0HukPr/Uu0JZ9+c=
Received: from cmcc-PC ([221.130.253.135]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszb6.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id A1F27447; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:40:31 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1597110031t33yi6u8c
Message-ID: <tencent_A60BD4A0CF0FBB0E1F6F5BA55A4794457906@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NbcURrUi841Mdm4F7pz0EPqcRDYj1q4Nd2IwiGwk9Iw7SqUd+BaLUuS0KeHPOw upCSRnkdaE5GFw+yGbi7hEiMe/xZNREBMLIHsxBpL5FIA7nR50OnFqeHM5Nc2ouvpdiV2XjN4EpW bqvrBNOEP+2wICjCjf/3+pC8PppxWzuukJwlhzl0QIvyI6num5feFp9+oxTtirqBRCBCJEV+6Rib c+ZD2UGksFRUCVFq0xLXcmEXN70Iv93dMGMP8sdEPIdPOz0lKh95PYXKmV87ybX/UM/6XHrVpeAY 6GycTF8+A0lGqTqYdtBXi2NuKi+Kbs0/yQXywJeb7gQMMlm+KIIEJda4bMR9GDDuJJqoHZZLl+++ E/BAB8G2Br6IgCrIrPOfqkiJ9NGayl3NmAVUYH0Sd51iwf3CSrgITzJeEczELzE3y4WPGwSvAnbo kR/0mfEoSWRaaWrHiRQICWuGxE3KvBCB3ZYQZ1iIHJ10xpRquJaH4fs+aXi2lt3FEag86aZgUXCm S4mzGn94hl9tIa+GjCiNFYK7xk+RkxM463N4OWmhHuhi7uuk4kfkgNnJTBZMFel4mDHUkMoGme2/ KFq0Z0Z4SKlpCKJen3fruO3FrkqaicJAEbuVQm8YVMrCADT35QKEJk3IkpKIIzR7w7T/E6MWuxLq 84bTMrwmZFNmbd1K9czjFzmNZbyT0A38B6h39738jaRKw6uW7Y6vwJaO2f04l/hVEi18711Ex1kD kA+dukx/j31u+hZHrc1IdScO529qHlyTaX
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:42:45 +0800
From: "duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
To: "Andy Bierman" <andy@yumaworks.com>, "Kent Watsen" <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <01000173c0b44d61-4df9b67b-47f9-46f5-9c91-6e00f466a5c5-000000@us-east-1.amazonses.com>, <CABCOCHT1tNUcwXffK2GGYvp1LcaTMugcvULYxKGdNL4p5dihdg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.16.188[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020081109424438815622@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart215586084164_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/WbRNzOx27ZtVHULzWc-EGWNjc0Q>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:40:48 -0000

Hi, Andy

    I am interested in the mechinism, too. 
    The mechenism can be seen as a more intelligent negociation between the server and the client.

Best Regards
Zongpeng Du



duzongpeng@foxmail.com & duzongpeng@chinamobile.com
 
From: Andy Bierman
Date: 2020-08-11 03:39
To: Kent Watsen
CC: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription
Hi,

I am trying to understand the problem statement in this draft.
It appears to propose a complex self-monitoring system so that YANG Push
subscriptions can change their parameters on the fly to adapt to
changing network conditions. E.g. lower the 'period' parameter when
conditions are right, to produce more push-update records than normal.

The problem is somewhat interesting.
The filtering mechanisms in YANG Push are really awful and there is a need
to improve both filter and trigger mechanisms.  I don't think this draft offers
a reasonable solution, but I encourage further experimentation.
Prove it works in real products then maybe it will be ready for standardization.


Andy


On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:18 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
NETCONF WG,

Per the previous email sent moments ago, the chairs would like to solicit input on the following draft:

   Title: Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notification
   Link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription
   Abstract:

      This document defines a YANG data model and associated mechanism
      enabling subscriber's adaptive subscriptions to a publisher's event
      streams at various different period intervals with which to report
      updates.  Applying these elements allows both subscriber and
      publisher to automatically adjust the volume of telemetry traffic
      sent from publisher to the receivers.


In particular, please discuss adoption-suitability as it regards to the following questions:

    1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
    2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?


PS: this message is itself not an adoption poll, but rather an attempt to gauge interest/support for a potential future adoption poll.

NETCONF Chairs
_______________________________________________
netconf mailing list
netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf