IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] WGLC on draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4643A0C05 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTouDc7q1Y4w for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C3E3A0C07 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id r5so5277499ilb.2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rLJBSjgdRX6KsoGNZHSbAftIVOnEq9nGrQ6E1mhGZsk=; b=MQOa13ZfX4T6ExAt9vlznVcesLiM3u7aDeNgiEHhnDcm7OBrrmjm+AfseE/lpWDcJR YUCp+uRICs3ikg4xygz5mAVcWW/l67q9mlHD9DGyGXn0o/wp+5cYlGzb5zrC2JcAtMSn 2lFBhmat7irgS6ysghIe58ai7VN2/isayajWRotts14FxuhMgLgWr0i+pfMTSuGzwVin vyippo3HGebHzF6FWxOqTEp65YfJNvyGpTBhGjzuBNiG7yerSurUufM3p3izW45xd2Hj OAHtDea56XgH2CYCf6LNnqSo8Iy/clbk75hDxB/L8U8PEOcEt5V8xa98KMW+KV4GJ/MV Ni0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rLJBSjgdRX6KsoGNZHSbAftIVOnEq9nGrQ6E1mhGZsk=; b=a9+XuzVxvffKTyXYkonzCw92voBm9+cMS/rUkKitKaLB+1DVtHsmySYR2ss4BjTYbD P9eW32/9wXbDXV2EHdWjsWJo4nJCOYCPXSWw31NeNGdJ9CV9FSrlGF3I3tRtGp9/yDet PFQgpmIL1ClNybgYSR5CRP3N2LTNxx99e2cnkpq67zY/ju5HRbEsybvP0A1AXZWxR897 +/zAKljv/jYZv2W9lMOX7g5I1Dp3fbyoiy8z+dznNjVrJQ/EmlPixYnNr3EQpZLLAuR0 r8nef8uJr9Ai8b6BN+9Zp2UNbFBt4XQwMRxvBOuGOzwV0YWZD8r8y6roOONM+Y/hXj3v it6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320gfrIwLCzkGQr3Oj7KAOnh3rajXPYYNKcXr5BiTLJZ86XexFQ sNFr2fM2HmGb3wfdKFu8RINeGrG1v4kPaFROVY4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHWNCNZU5WfJyXkj2lPB7oiA42UZG2KxDQ1kUNSwL+k+UZxgXlb3mdkDvimRpgeym/73lDnbyG1S6QMlaU+as=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:20c5:: with SMTP id 5mr9289277ilq.14.1618303407792; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E8878253-12DD-4943-8E26-0CBE121290DA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8878253-12DD-4943-8E26-0CBE121290DA@gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:12:51 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6DyaE8TM=c_j63MK3FJfmhYZcA8Bdu6YNXPg-+OHy7dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c2af7e05bfd69f2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/Wp-6n98K8vqmnm4-AxHZk9XbJxI>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WGLC on draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:43:34 -0000

Hi Mahesh, WG,

I have reviewed the draft. The PCE YANG uses these groupings and I am happy
to see the WG make progress on this I-D.

Few comments -
- Both abstract and introduction say that the first module is the TLS
client whereas the first module defined in this I-D is the TLS common.
- I am wondering if anything needs to be done for the older versions of TLS
which are made historic. The use of features helps, is there any other
guidance that needs to be given?
- Why is there no identity for TLS 1.3?
- For the feature tls-1_3, the description says 1.2
- Copyright year in the YANG modules is still 2020
- Authors in the YANG module is inconsistent with the I-D
- Reference used in YANG (FIPS PUB 180-4) needs to be added in the I-D as
well.

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 4:01 AM Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> We are starting a 2 week WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server
> version 23.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server/
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr/>
>
> Please respond on this thread indicating your support or concerns about
> why this document should/should not be adopted.
>
> We are particularly interested in statement of the form:
>
> - I have reviewed the draft and found no issues.
> - I have reviewed the draft and found the following issues …
>
> This WGLC will conclude on Friday, April 9. An IPR call will be issued
> separately.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email