Re: [Netconf] Monitoring draft RFC Editors notes

Andy Bierman <andyb@iwl.com> Fri, 18 June 2010 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <andyb@iwl.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1407C3A6A0A for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.642, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8trSr+mw88q for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp224.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp224.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.224]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A103A6A89 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay12.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay12.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7CA8B20D8CB; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:46:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay12.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: andyb-AT-iwlcorp.com) with ESMTPSA id 05D4C20DC13; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:46:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C1B8669.2020909@iwl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:44:57 -0700
From: Andy Bierman <andyb@iwl.com>
Organization: Interworking Labs, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
References: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64984DA7@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <006b01cb0eea$ea6ded80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <006b01cb0eea$ea6ded80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring@tools.ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Monitoring draft RFC Editors notes
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: andyb@iwl.com
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:46:31 -0000

On 06/18/2010 06:33 AM, t.petch wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
> To: <netconf@ietf.org>
> Cc: <draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring@tools.ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:52 PM
>   
>> based on the DISCUSSes and comments of the IESG on the Monitoring draft
>> we are going to fix the draft text as added to the RFC editors notes:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring/#writeup
>>
>> Please check it and let us know if you find any typo or another
>> immediate issue.
>>     
> only that every time I click on the URI, I get a long, long wait, CRL downloaded
> and a long long wait and
> (oh the anticipation)
>
> a blank screen
>
>   

loads fine for me (firefox 3.5 on ubuntu 10.04)

draft edits look good; no issues;

> No matter, I am sure that by now someone else will have thought of everything I
> would have thought of.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
>   

Andy