Re: [Netconf] Monitoring draft RFC Editors notes

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 18 June 2010 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29DF3A68CF for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.368, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VolKzDNcCSOq for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c2beaomr04.btconnect.com (c2beaomr04.btconnect.com [213.123.26.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8933A683E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc6 (host81-153-11-165.range81-153.btcentralplus.com [81.153.11.165]) by c2beaomr04.btconnect.com with SMTP id CFA78251; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:37:08 +0100 (BST)
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A020302.4C1B8493.0365, actions=tag
Message-ID: <006b01cb0eea$ea6ded80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, netconf@ietf.org
References: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64984DA7@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:33:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr04.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020203.4C1B84B3.00D1, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Monitoring draft RFC Editors notes
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:37:42 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: <netconf@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring@tools.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:52 PM
>
> based on the DISCUSSes and comments of the IESG on the Monitoring draft
> we are going to fix the draft text as added to the RFC editors notes:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring/#writeup
>
> Please check it and let us know if you find any typo or another
> immediate issue.

only that every time I click on the URI, I get a long, long wait, CRL downloaded
and a long long wait and
(oh the anticipation)

a blank screen

No matter, I am sure that by now someone else will have thought of everything I
would have thought of.

Tom Petch


>
> The draft will hopefully go through the IESG chat tomorrow.
> So please indicate only serious issues.
>
> Mehmet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf