Re: [Netconf] New WGLC for a proposed new WG Charter - respond BEFORE Sept 1st

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

+ 1

Regards, Benoit.
> We had agreed in our last f2f meeting that people would submit
> individual I-Ds, and based on that we would potentially
> consider work in this space. So by all means do submit
> such individual drafts and discuss them on the mailing list.
>
> But we do not have a good problem statement or starting I-D
> to base this work on, so cannot put it on the current charter.
>
> Bert Wijnen
>
> On 8/17/12 11:04 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had the impression that there was a reasonable agreement that work 
>> on operational state data is needed. Although this problem lies 
>> somewhere between NETCONF and NETMOD, I think the NETCONF WG is now 
>> in a better position to start this work because apparently NETMOD WG 
>> will have to continue the work on the core data models for some time.
>>
>> So I propose the following fourth item for the charter:
>>
>> 4. The WG will investigate the relationship and interactions between 
>> configurations and
>>     operational state data, propose their appropriate representation 
>> and semantics, and
>>     devise methods for effective data modeling of both configurations 
>> and operational state data.
>>     It is expected that this work will be carried out in a close 
>> sooperation with the NETMOD WG.
>>
>> Lada
>>
>> "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <[e-mail]> writes:
>>
>>> Based on the comments and feedback and the positions
>>> expressed on the mailing list, it is clear that after all
>>> we did NOT have consensus on the new WG charter.
>>>
>>> Without further ado, this is another proposed WG charter.
>>> It focuses on the things that we do seme to have agreement on.
>>>
>>> Pls comment and/or express your support or objections
>>> no later than August 31, 2012.
>>>
>>> OK, new chapter text (omitting the description of what we have
>>> achieved sofar):
>>>
>>>     In the current phase of the incremental development of NETCONF the
>>>     workgroup will focus on following items:
>>>
>>>     1. Advance NETCONF over TLS to be in-line with NETCONF 1:1.
>>>        This means that RFC5593 needs to be updated.
>>>
>>>     2. Based on the implementation, deployment experience and 
>>> interoperability
>>>        testing, the WG will document the status of NETCONF in a report.
>>>        Based on this, the WG may decide to make some clarifications to
>>>        RFC6241 and RFC6242 (then also fixing any reported errata).
>>>
>>>     3. Since Netconf over BEEP and over SOAP seem not being deployed
>>>        the WG will write a document that makes those 2 protocols
>>>        (RFC4743 and RFC4744) HISTORIC.
>>>
>>> Goals and Milestones:
>>>     done     - Send with-defaults to IESG for consideration as 
>>> Proposed Standard
>>>     done     - WG Last Call on rfc4741bis
>>>     done     - rfc4741bis to IESG for consideration as Proposed 
>>> Standard
>>>     done     - Send rfc4742bis to IESG for consideration as proposed 
>>> Standard.
>>>     done     - first WG draft (rev 00) on NACM posted
>>>     done     - first WG draft (rev 00) on NETCONF specific YANG 
>>> modules posted
>>>     done     - WGLC for NACM document
>>>     done     - WGLC for NETCONF specific notifications document
>>>     done     - submit NACM document to IESG for consideration as 
>>> Proposed Standard
>>>     done     - submit NETCONF specific notifications  document to 
>>> IESG for
>>>                consideration as Proposed Standard
>>>     Aug 2012 - submit initial WG draft for rfc5539bis
>>>     Aug 2012 - submit initial WG draft for making RFC4743 and 
>>> RFC4744 historic.
>>>     Sep 2012 - WGLC for rfc5539bis
>>>     Sep 2012 - WGLC for RFC4743 and 4743 to historic
>>>     Oct 2012 - submit rfc5539bis to AD/IESG for consideration as 
>>> Proposed Standard
>>>     Oct 2012 - submit request to AD/IESG to make RFC4743 and 4744 
>>> historic
>>>     Nov 2012 - Collect Implementation/Deployment reports for RFC6241 
>>> and 6242
>>>     Dec 2012 - Initial I-D for RFC6241/6242 
>>> implementation/deployment experience
>>>     Jan 2013 - WGLC on RFC6241/6242 implementation/deployment 
>>> experience
>>>     Feb 2013 - submit RFC6241/6242 implementation/deployment 
>>> experience doc
>>>                to IESG for publication as Informational RFC.
>>>     Mar 2013 - Evaluate if more work needs to be done by NETCONF WG 
>>> or close WG
>>>
>>> Bert and Mehmet
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Netconf mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
>