IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Virtual hum for the question on "https-notif" draft

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 27 April 2020 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BB23A0745 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=aXz835Wy; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Mvw9Sjx5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-nDFVVmG5zh for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940AF3A0746 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9624; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1587989292; x=1589198892; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=ZmozQi7wGOlHjMh4Wi+kuZqeI6ge98zRLwgd/ZJe8ok=; b=aXz835Wy95BL5E6S5t9qDO9hDKvB20op7GOh2HsZ9F9iiBeK6qQ4vMHp uH0Ko8/KPgN0e1a53YM5odh/Ac4wruqZ7kq0RbWIsKNtXKjNyboDflGDq odRSDUEH8lyiXf0oi0jcoJT/IfQBGYt4ihP1OtIoj7y5cgrKHxd1RFsjN w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:KYuBxBxspYxWTRbXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YhSN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZufFkz/MPnsRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAgAIyqZe/49dJa1cCh0BAQEJAREFBQE8gTYFAQsBgSQvUQVsWCAECyoKh1sDinJOghGTT4RgglIDVAsBAQEMAQEjCgIEAQGERAKCKCQ3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXEBAQEBAxIGFRMBATgPAgEIDgMEAQEOITIdCAIEARIIGoMFgX5NAy4BAwumRgKBOYhhdIE0gwABAQWBMgEDAoN0GIIOAwaBOAGCYolaGoFBP4ERQ4IfLj6CZwEBA4E1LyuDF4ItjiWJKppXCoJFiA+QDoJbiFeRSY8CDGyBVodykz4CBAIEBQIOAQEFgWgjgVZwFYMkUBgNkTSDcoUUhUJ0NQIGCAEBAwl8jRABgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,324,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="743835439"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Apr 2020 12:08:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03RC8BwU024800 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:08:11 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:08:11 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:08:10 -0400
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:08:10 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=IWhYXFhbacGOTF08RI16Qgzroe0wXR//aLcM1hlR+JLmx4bQa4Nk7/jC80sDzfOfjGYmOMbBlJccMK2lrkBLsBFrb8Wg4he5rNKhaU8mYDMbjwvlOiQt/GaQ8neacsVKel6LFGH367vFilIpZfnN1vJ3/IPRFQC26iNcupVuBHwaSiDfyR4YKK1+rzqyK650246fkn2pyaVjrR8Mn8BzCPbjCwxwVsnIHmMsrEp01LIbkOh/cU5hGu1jlBbtROyPCNBgt42LbNca4aoMjbE+4paNc/hN/xenaK36B43icYPWdncyy/+yJGqUy6jby8TBKDCHi8kP8eRqZ3uP7NN/+A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HxVX57LYpV2CflyFYPZugH7aauSWOb1R7zbKzjJ+G9U=; b=YVqjxv5FmbrrFr/f+Bc8xzEtU3MzuSQZjj2mNYn9w+IMu7UggfEhYRbRFzSJSpOfgkIcwGn2tdoRySrMbr1BLXvRiKZrNjKFPKXivOD2ZlDfbzNwdCtxTy1QXX6+N4fxqcobPGGym990t2OJLkOnj+YSBjU439L3SmOJigCC+c5tsjnpUH7hnTQFeSBetbzvz21t956mywW1m0KThCDwFCksIi8TDtMUl451uGTDgrYjCV9BVsPhBz71IM0wsxb6HUVo2eUxX90MQp97keFo0A/ETa4Lnab8e2OOJTlMlH7uvIVkt1d6CZc1JPxt/yu190zg7fC26+ARKDFylA/pHw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HxVX57LYpV2CflyFYPZugH7aauSWOb1R7zbKzjJ+G9U=; b=Mvw9Sjx5q72VnysG+GABgSfdlHbhDTX+kTJzPBLU8PqA9KbvBlNKEK4UH7Auzvuos6gzfH0hHW5wpL9ESW5Zno2o4PFzxoqsyK08vPgT0IrKUeTjMHVj+JyPis/DNYsO/5l3/+QeHLTnYuGgaoDDrZez3jROKhhkgVoDSeLx+/o=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB4142.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:135::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.22; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:08:08 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3:2164:a8e2:33b3]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3:2164:a8e2:33b3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2937.023; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:08:08 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] Virtual hum for the question on "https-notif" draft
Thread-Index: AQHWF3adA7Ki6eMehUKoLjqeAVObUaiM5sHA
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:08:08 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4366FC94F18140F1BB153A1FB5AF0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5CE2095E-7117-4092-B356-A5C4FF490D10@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5CE2095E-7117-4092-B356-A5C4FF490D10@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.15.79.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 32504659-9c07-4dea-bb4c-08d7eaa3a668
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4142:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4142284CC8CE872D5CACEAF5B5AF0@MN2PR11MB4142.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0386B406AA
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(86362001)(186003)(8936002)(478600001)(26005)(55016002)(5660300002)(52536014)(81156014)(9686003)(2906002)(8676002)(966005)(71200400001)(66946007)(66556008)(66476007)(53546011)(7696005)(33656002)(316002)(76116006)(66446008)(64756008)(110136005)(6506007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB4366FC94F18140F1BB153A1FB5AF0MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 32504659-9c07-4dea-bb4c-08d7eaa3a668
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Apr 2020 12:08:08.6725 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: /4juQ3LKg0lhNbEw+stdtUEuS3RS9/Ew6JuMUBU7EKMaaIDS+1FO2cMJ7bXY+V1h9hOybBQ7bMi30HWiXVodkg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4142
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/bQK3MVBd4RWk6ng-Nwwr5LfeuDA>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Virtual hum for the question on "https-notif" draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:08:15 -0000

[As an individual contributor]

Changing my stance somewhat from the NETCONF meeting ...

After looking into the details a bit more, section 7 of rfc8639 states:

   A specification for a transport MUST identify any encodings that are
   supported.  If a configured subscription's transport allows different
   encodings, the specification MUST identify the default encoding.

Does this imply that the http-notif draft either must state a default encoding (or otherwise update rfc8639)?

If so, my thinking is to make the default encoding JSON, because it is easier to generate than XML, and easier to convert into CBOR.  Clients don't have to support JSON if they know that the publisher supports a different encoding that they do support.

I've also filled in the virtual hum.

Regards,
Rob



From: netconf <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani
Sent: 21 April 2020 01:48
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: [netconf] Virtual hum for the question on "https-notif" draft


At the 107 NETCONF virtual meeting, the authors posed the question of mandatory encoding for draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-02> draft to the WG. This virtual hum in the form of a survey is being presented to record the response from the WG.

Please respond by selecting one of the options in the survey page.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/68W3DX3

The relevant slide that was used for discussion was this. In addition to the options discussed here, Rob suggested that the WG could defer to the market to decide.

Thanks

Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email