Re: [Netconf] WG adoption of NETCONF NDMA draft

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 03 October 2017 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558D9134CA2 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 03:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id idJ-Pnemvz0i for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 03:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6066D134578 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 03:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3986; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507027986; x=1508237586; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=AKDY08P9RMJj0gL6Ri1jy9vuDErGKxVSZIB4HXFsD2Y=; b=R743JbC6fig4lzLdlRiCTuLXIEIiJekxqJT0kUYnttGgYYu/Zbe5FsjM BhtvFonR/kpEp+DPx941iKJjXO+lW+Xk3B6XoRUzsv4xRyHFb3dO+KMEv p4vgTjMxE+xV5SwUO7+ai14C1AXDXsgwuVmlS7T9XGtKfp4KqX8l2eylX k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAgD0atNZ/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhEFuJ48MkEOIZYgrh1AKGAEKhElPAoUNFQECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkCAQMBAWwbCwQKMQchBh8RBgEMBgIBAYoUAxUQp1QnhxoNg2QBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEbBYMtg1OBaisLgnKCXogaAQSYWIgePIdeiA6EeYIUhW+DWocsihOCXYEJh1uBOTUigQ4yIQgdFUmFGhyBaT42iVQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,474,1500940800"; d="scan'208,217";a="697731520"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2017 10:53:02 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v93Ar1Fm007041; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:53:02 GMT
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <AA781EFC-A7B5-490B-BF85-DE4FA3FDE26F@gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <e1b1875d-3359-5860-c024-ffc3a889d355@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:52:58 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AA781EFC-A7B5-490B-BF85-DE4FA3FDE26F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------FB7956AC1EC354C987DF1922"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/cs2eRuvBcmyYvU0RxBw05d6iXN8>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption of NETCONF NDMA draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:53:08 -0000

Support. Much needed work.

Benoit (individual contributor).
> The NETCONF NDMA draft was presented an discussed in IETF 99 in 
> Prague. The authors agreed to provide an update, which they did with 
> -01 version of the draft. The authors believe the document is ready 
> for WG adoption.
>
> This starts a two week call to adopt NETCONF NDMA draft as a WG 
> document. Since the focus of the draft is NDMA compliance, it falls 
> within the charter of the WG.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-netconf-01
>
> Please indicate whether you think this draft should be adopted as a WG 
> item. If you have objections to it being adopted, please state your 
> reasons by responding on this thread.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf