IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG adoption of NETCONF NDMA draft

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 27 September 2017 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD4D134D5D for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.935
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1Emsrxri3S1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBD3134D63 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=184.157.84.200;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Kent Watsen' <kwatsen@juniper.net>, 'Giles Heron' <giles.heron@gmail.com>, 'Mahesh Jethanandani' <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Cc: 'netconf' <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <AA781EFC-A7B5-490B-BF85-DE4FA3FDE26F@gmail.com> <2421997E-7511-49C4-AA8C-C51F3B28A94F@gmail.com> <3C61A3FD-DFD9-444A-89D5-580ADDB27DEC@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <3C61A3FD-DFD9-444A-89D5-580ADDB27DEC@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:23:01 -0400
Message-ID: <031a01d3379c$2052f5d0$60f8e170$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_031B_01D3377A.99424030"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKnIWaf+XxG3mxnCCxok0yu8h8s9wFP4zySAPlJ58ehDquh8A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/hXi_JW_JpGSz1DQn-SL43PF0O0s>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption of NETCONF NDMA draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:29:49 -0000

I would like to second Kent’s comments as an individual contributor and as the i2RS WG co-chair. 

 

The NETCONF WG has shown that they can pick apart difficult problems and come up with a complete solution.  I trust that they can do this with this draft. 

 

Susan Hares 

 

From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:48 AM
To: Giles Heron; Mahesh Jethanandani
Cc: netconf
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption of NETCONF NDMA draft

 

Support.  We need to update the NETCONF protocol to support the NMDA.  Details can be worked out as a WG document.

 

Kent, as a contributor and author.

 

 

On 9/26/17, 4:20 AM, "Netconf on behalf of Giles Heron" <netconf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:

 

support - looks good to me. 

 

On 24 Sep 2017, at 07:18, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:

 

The NETCONF NDMA draft was presented an discussed in IETF 99 in Prague. The authors agreed to provide an update, which they did with -01 version of the draft. The authors believe the document is ready for WG adoption. 

 

This starts a two week call to adopt NETCONF NDMA draft as a WG document. Since the focus of the draft is NDMA compliance, it falls within the charter of the WG. 

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-netconf-01 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Ddsdt-2Dnmda-2Dnetconf-2D01&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=W6yKXS2L9xIg5DAhfaQmhLjd6AgCe59UpfSA7hJLTz4&s=kYb6fqfpf1JAPAdoqUPpp4ot_yuxGx6XVqM1zUQK8f0&e=> 

 

Please indicate whether you think this draft should be adopted as a WG item. If you have objections to it being adopted, please state your reasons by responding on this thread.

 

Thanks.

 

Mahesh Jethanandani

mjethanandani@gmail.com

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email