Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-26.txt

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Fri, 05 April 2024 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018eaf32e91f-5260fa2b-5610-4892-a2e4-405a24b57328-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEA5C15109E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8GYQ1_kvEAw for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB30C151086 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1712336333; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:Feedback-ID; bh=CHHc5JtkDDbLsOcPdVis4mFSKEP01OpA9110xdgXKr0=; b=Jv9JqDdYLzHgJ7UOSwwmIHYjMa41bQviKdgjGWVdLG401unf7ayuP4/F8bxuePzH +YByE2feKmPCHJ+4dnjGYHHk0g7RYiFDvN4gwQt54jEjfjcBmybDfJsSn6xGt3hQTvU Go7EeKRZJqAyGtDuKU1Xt93VQ5Mfiv7mFbRM3Pyo=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4DBFEFB4-43F6-4930-9CBB-212E72786119"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 16:58:53 +0000
Message-ID: <0100018eaf32e91f-5260fa2b-5610-4892-a2e4-405a24b57328-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <6D67330E-3210-43B8-85FC-ECFBAF6E4494@gmail.com>
Cc: BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, NETCONF WG <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6D67330E-3210-43B8-85FC-ECFBAF6E4494@gmail.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21E219)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.04.05-54.240.48.94
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/mTO8c14xtCL93Gr-BkC7RDRphxM>
Subject: Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-26.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 16:58:56 -0000


Hi Mahesh,

On Apr 5, 2024, at 12:31 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:

Just one comment.

On Apr 4, 2024, at 10:43 PM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:

(1) There is a nit in the tree diagram:
 
OLD:
      |  +-- local-address?   inet:ip-address
 
NEW:
      |  +-- local-address   inet:ip-address

Isn’t local-address a key for the list local-bind?

It is, and therefore the “local-address” node is implicitly “mandatory true”. 

This must be a bug in pyang, specific to groupings, as pyang renders it correctly when the grouping is “used” in a “container”. 

K. 

Cheers.

Mahesh Jethanandani