[netconf] reporting-level enum value
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Sat, 06 April 2019 12:03 UTC
Return-Path: <01000169f287fa3f-076e9a88-770f-41b1-9ffe-034061e6eedb-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DF5120005 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 05:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lhMotusOX_72 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 05:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-32.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-32.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2733312001A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 05:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1554552191; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-Id:Date:To:Feedback-ID; bh=Of4cDemh/ZrkIYvvPaI2WUJdrqj6j7uSX6h3fLW4Xbw=; b=gaV/liO//35PWZJDC3r36O4/xUpWXFKYK7xG49dWYvnrkF7pwzIlfya1o7K4vJj+ Ikt7Cz/U3FEmtCMsURnXNDHZZjA02I0hMnbbMSqolvashgWNhMYyp8rDoqvCCdiWkTy fP2jD22M8lgjkr7gEMxs6TEhjc4inWgPMxg8qcPM=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_16F78DF1-2757-47A5-9788-0FEEFA6B918D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Message-ID: <01000169f287fa3f-076e9a88-770f-41b1-9ffe-034061e6eedb-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:03:11 +0000
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.04.06-54.240.8.32
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/rD68uRihZJ-gK1lCxj3HOrcOLcA>
Subject: [netconf] reporting-level enum value
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:03:15 -0000
The zerotouch draft is in AUTH48 and one thing came up...
In Section 7.3, in the RPC-reply for the `get-boostrapping-data` RPC, there is a leaf called `reporting-level`:
"Specifies the reporting level for progress reports the
bootstrap server would like to receive when processing
onboarding information.
With current values "standard" and "verbose".
The question to the WG is, would it be in anyway better to NOT use the word "standard"?
Perhaps it should be "minimal", “default”, “mandatory”, or “required” instead?
Thoughts?
Kent
- [netconf] reporting-level enum value Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] reporting-level enum value Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [netconf] reporting-level enum value Kent Watsen