IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E50A1321AC for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id USG1-jOuPEjU for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA601329C3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b189so920996wmd.0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GGPC1nsv8Sy6mmyXNR0ei+Snd3ejuxZds/mZ4NKo+yc=; b=Mr3cCQQdS5ZmnRqZo5wk/D4f5rdoG0yUS1XM+8w5feBYgrYYWgpj1+NTAb0WZQvwHW GD3DBW8ZyT1mIwn5NNdR1FBihPIrofMfbwgF6Cl+nxNQVl1UQMdZ40R3366TfK3XzzfF zIz7Yqu1zMmWprqrVgJhGu3Vt03LbtA/QvjEGO0hQj14y2n+i/gBUpvn96U0SMjfjDmA enFxmgHyeDdARaHKiXCXJqjqRci3T1rS3BdSrcPZ27BxlS1YcXRui/E/ywf5KBG6OQrB 8HQJRSCVr4AEomgpKj2xSProVdynNmyZtsJUnqdxkx/j138H81Gx+n04njWHEtqqmPuX foQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GGPC1nsv8Sy6mmyXNR0ei+Snd3ejuxZds/mZ4NKo+yc=; b=NiOjf71LIt148CMIqyM3G1BaMHei6YdArRwneDkJriuYj48EoolevRN2ES2ENUH9Kn KPbAsvn/yLUujuDQBGqTC38LsZdQLmbiMJllyswdElplfaLg1xYhPihAqBSRkQtg/y2B tvdRlqU/tK0u+sSY466KTIJSwHnnvl4PFoe1iKp7Ui7veVKseJ++kZRjo+gwGRz7lYQH QZsBE8aLMyK6xT/jJuHEcVFddAzL/wv+s0ve7ea1T4igvwzuCE0nAs0PzmZvfn/RxNgz BJQUE/fbO3xL8gk5dsc0qV4kvGEJzQWkHTfvSEoiwRM34/rcToQnGbtb1TKRQuDUEwBm DwCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jRS0C15eY/4bHPwhxIAEPbJt5v9awrWELRpto+maAAXskt3ABF 0+Cli0gd8KeFg7Z4kazEIgO5skAzp5ye
X-Received: by 10.28.16.133 with SMTP id 127mr48023wmq.75.1503416837289; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.164.221 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <05545A83-FEB9-486F-9003-8ADD500D5884@juniper.net>
References: <05545A83-FEB9-486F-9003-8ADD500D5884@juniper.net>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:47:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHT2uqkudxX1orts0+uYaT+cEv1LFnik6_3MN4w45Pc8SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146d95089528b05575982c9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/s1x8385hhmUJU5MfxPMHRQMHF0k>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:47:21 -0000

Hi,

Is the NETCONF WG the proper venue to work on UDP?
Seems like the transport area would be a more appropriate home.

Why is this transport work specific to pub/sub?
It seems useful for unconstrained devices on constrained networks
to be able to use UDP instead of TCP for all management messages.


Andy


On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:

> All,
>
> This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a
> NETCONF working group document:
>
>   draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00 [1]
>
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
> to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
>
>
> Thank you,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email