IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (6363)

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Tue, 22 December 2020 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1953A10FD for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:07:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQuZzJnVXTV4 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:07:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2383A10FA for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id o17so32745796lfg.4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5m/OUZHPvsaOOqOIcImWoqZEHyzz6kjUx4fYJzHYCe0=; b=xgPUHIVVS8eJCUTkbWC/DFqw+tkL2pbqS7fhH70H8WKIeCluNl+3trh4ybyFe04Dlp 9wWJtfcQd4O2NG3uhwE7ZAcLG0evY19c8XVKR6Pyl7kQonmHuPXjLJ/nSwryTGQkqrQx rpji0XGSvICUiS9RdA5LjsqhIaebYwyVkmSXoGiQ9yaR29e6EKiPQsSLrmPXyBn4zvKa SBNqK5gu/3JnZO94NkN3MVDZZM+PnH7sFgGiBppur4NFiCfc8iltbP2DqlLjM7qpNA0G 93jP2W+sUP51RGqx+NEix8thJFIggm9Ebh2mQUvYGgcH9eNjnvPrdeUOXUioxwtW3IFL 4T8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5m/OUZHPvsaOOqOIcImWoqZEHyzz6kjUx4fYJzHYCe0=; b=jNsHya1H8JS9z7/byzm+Jg+fD0C3Uq8vvTSJ1YN2NzeSwyao1RzsLUb23vXwYLNTtb /N8gvHyR6CcJBfs2fY2DdSS+eergtl4lH5E5QoP9qhoPVBAhRKVXnFvjxI+b87WRpVGs QtwE/AkV1GcsTdEUpUg40wWZ9k25v9KFLdnfh0QW7UqG5mk0y/S3DU7h9MAEZwqWuUOj /BgMTAIduYpieJfAqPcDC4zaEUvFgTIZ1lOBXFAJC6OEzZMUzTqsTC2W/P0eTsDcQ2o+ YRu+2p+0aI+OilAX7UbJUtQz32/KyIkiWaaCgWuMqwkMS+2SXC9QVMefKcf0AbIeYulE FyrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KpxEVgG3q8neuTzZOoirLf54bS+j2/hZzu+qK/ftTOdCh+4bT bnQgmG5UQzBPdOf8Bx+fuS99qol6FkQTS1tyBflFiA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/Xq7CKj4X1lJdr5YA6rBedQXOZqxlIsYtF23d1NyiOvrPG8xZJrVLajD8zP+dEEWvc+qq20R6Q7y9WrTVVrw=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:598f:: with SMTP id w15mr8334335lfn.577.1608649618911; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:06:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201222143949.F33E8F40744@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201222143949.F33E8F40744@rfc-editor.org>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:06:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHR3qG0N6FYzUT9rSFy8T9rZhcXdHobCov8Lb_yKZmL4eQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, muly_i@rad.com, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001a89d705b70eed10"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/sp60cW4dPUj8Oj4J7kLiPZ93hJI>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (6363)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:07:03 -0000

Hi,

This errata should be rejected.
The proposed text changes the semantics of the paragraph.
The original word "will" is not ambiguous or used in error.


Andy


On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:40 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040,
> "RESTCONF Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6363
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com>
>
> Section: 4.8.2.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    By default, the server will include all sub-resources within a
>    retrieved resource that have the same resource type as the requested
>    resource.  The exception is the datastore resource.  If this resource
>    type is retrieved, then by default the datastore and all child data
>    resources are returned.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    By default, the server SHOULD include all sub-resources within a
>    retrieved resource that have the same resource type as the requested
>    resource.  The exception is the datastore resource.  If this resource
>    type is retrieved, then by default the datastore and all child data
>    resources are returned.
>
> Notes
> -----
> Substitute "will" by "SHOULD".
>
> Use one of the keywords of RFC2119 to clarify the expected server behavior.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RESTCONF Protocol
> Publication Date    : January 2017
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email