Re: [Netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Andy


On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Authors,
>
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption of "draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01",
> are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft?
>
> Please state either:
>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware
> of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For
> more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>
>
>