Re: [Netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0BC132977 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wrNe1dgI3y96 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7CE132518 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2982; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503406137; x=1504615737; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=u906ZV1cFD8RGqYNh5NkxsfZg+qcDklLqjhdZ5ri0Ns=; b=ki/NBaLIjHH3GlJ2mAM/MQcaN6EBWjKiNH84LbmkiPfmmvVxszwJ/70M BRJnuiGkEfm2BZaDrpAp1wUhIwqZhG8mZuSSPMGbLUnHzYGK+VD3YJzMl G7LEAIlIPblDyxYxOORB8hPPI5IudpHDz2Lbpm7jBGpvWb3qMHReZy93a 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CdAAAjJ5xZ/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHjgyQGIFulh8OggQshRsCGoQFPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMjEUADAgwEAgEIDgMEAQEDAiMDAgICMBQBCAgCBAENBQiKKRCsPYImi14BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQ2CHYICgUyBY4MnhEABEgE2gnyCYQWgVQKHU4xlghlZhQmKbpYoAR84fwt3FUmHGnYBiGKBI4EPAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,412,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="285892370"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2017 12:48:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7MCmtUA016920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:48:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:48:55 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:48:55 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "andy@yumaworks.com" <andy@yumaworks.com>, "ludwig@clemm.org" <ludwig@clemm.org>, "Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <timjenki@cisco.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
Thread-Index: AQHTGsmvQpgXRYM8T0idt1h9zSemOqKQVFPg
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:48:55 +0000
Message-ID: <e15e4afc19cd482cb2c299b01162d1cd@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <0BB5D437-8C0A-4E56-BE19-0FE027D57EB2@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <0BB5D437-8C0A-4E56-BE19-0FE027D57EB2@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/xqWHGgmSKi4Xj1DZP2MaIO5_XYc>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:48:59 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Watsen [mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 6:06 PM
> To: Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>; andy@yumaworks.com;
> ludwig@clemm.org; Tim Jenkins (timjenki) <timjenki@cisco.com>
> Cc: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
> 
> Authors,
> 
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption of "draft-voit-netconf-notification-
> messages-01", are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft?
> 
> Please state either:
>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
> 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.
> 
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the above
> by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response
> has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES
> TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an
> author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR
> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others
> on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or
> discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the
> RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
> 
> 
>