[netext] COMMENTS ON draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-04

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 11 September 2012 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A333B21F84B5 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LV8gDhRMG+6C for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2502221F8608 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ieak13 with SMTP id k13so1604127iea.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hhzj6LMDvNk+Y4cuusPQgbLxGwJF1TFrgMiDitgRvgo=; b=im4wSrb17rU5hNYxMRUTKooQ9MtUIpAkoDI2BXQ1wHe/QX+rI+G8fwk9jkR+bNG5Ek G/eb/r4QTKe/URD7H3pTVU4KqeHQJzyXL4MmPnY8b+nrT18H0t+n2h7ivexk6rj7ImlS LOgNdLHqUShyfmCz88aslstcLZIcXIsZhViyy4ssJwjbFcglU3n1mVUDHkgz7t7bpL2u GQQap7LiZp7lBArkhYTD84eDQwWsmCBvjBo6yGGnjcnOdbpZT0mm7b5PyXcfE0ei0/zV kSjLv8cQ+xfyGN8tjnNPTE2i7Xg8AXvmQPHWNJZwZNF8n0EdY7zDL2jIAJGvFcHvNy+a L7Jw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.57.202 with SMTP id k10mr18183250igq.45.1347387167604; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.55.70 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:12:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcdHfpqqdkkKv0iDA8xU4gRJ2oYyvtUhLR4o7vwWxot-vw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: netext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [netext] COMMENTS ON draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-04
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:12:48 -0000

I had posted this mail almost a month ago and have not seen any reply yet?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I have questions on Section 3.2.1. on MN sharing a common set of
> prefixes on all MAGs.
>
> I don't understand why this is related to flow mobility but not prefix
> allocation policy.
> In Fig. 2, you consider flow Y to pref1::mn1 on if2
>
> and then you move flow Y to if1. I am confused about the figure. How
> come pref1::mn1 and pref1::mn1 stays the same? What is mn1? Is it the
> iid?
> Do you assume that both if1 and if2 have the same iid? How could this
> be possible? Secondly you did not mention this assumption.
>
> I think that if2 should be referred to as mn2 then the situation will
> be clear, i.e. moving flows between two different interfaces with
> different addresses, so this case is not any different than the cases
> you have in Sections 3.2.2 and 3.2.3.
>
> You  explain in this section that some flow mobility update action (?)
> happens in both LMA and MN and the flow is magically moved. Even if we
> assume what you have is correct this case does not deserve any mention
> in the draft, i.e. there is no observable action to specify.
>
> I have more coming up later.
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet