[netext] Question about extending the ANI option
Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> Wed, 07 May 2014 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <bpatil1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0341A0859 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 07:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HD1pt1Nk_i-X for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 07:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCE11A07B3 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 07:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wo20so1231816obc.21 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 May 2014 07:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PVCg4KHo3bJ9Bw4LMhTl5ydiQcibQURq3aDPrXdDdiU=; b=VqAHRTLYllZyL1k2Bgr+h1kJCPXAnY1y4Ezy/Uc0Epg/mz5FvtHOA5wuY/emfJEsQN msJdFhwWlFOM7gNxt96jthKZF9JvJs8dPvIGAFG3fYptrCMSKCEPqIu8x+qqSsgW5U1S IUBu+fxVUT+/C8a1/HtaZRBczE5UZWDEdVzxM52xNPrKRXUbf0X/0Hk5Jqk+jW5Mtk/J VeJu/RqyArFxuxTgM02VW6eZd/nYYIbWZWpIbcc22k5gWpZDo0CA+5iSW6EMRzUbSOs2 mBCwaDC0NY24yi+O9ogbbZ3ej5Z3pEI7Xz+tHLH+U3cQE7rNFZH+y9n87oSzRG7eYawm CU2A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.69.71 with SMTP id c7mr2736656oeu.82.1399471702536; Wed, 07 May 2014 07:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.161.42 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2014 07:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 09:08:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA5F1T2o6=+ZOh20WVOFGwKo8=Pc41SbOkQV3KJph41Dtbe93g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
To: draft-pazhyannur-netext-civic-location-ani-subopt@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133194ab3f7c504f8cfe5b2"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/JfeWKIQlrpehRm1x6gywP5aGp9Q
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: [netext] Question about extending the ANI option
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 14:08:27 -0000
Hello authors, Couple of questions regarding the problem being that this I-D aims to solve: 1. Why is the existing ANI option not sufficient for encoding WLAN specific information? 2. Is the primary goal to provide information regarding location? And as a means for indoor location tracking? The I-D does not really explain the key problem to be solved other than saying that 3GPP has a requirement in WLAN deployments. It would be good if you can explain the motivation to the WG so that the WG can decide on adopting and progressing this I-D. -Raj -- Basavaraj Patil
- [netext] Question about extending the ANI option Basavaraj Patil
- Re: [netext] Question about extending the ANI opt… Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)
- Re: [netext] Question about extending the ANI opt… Basavaraj Patil
- Re: [netext] Question about extending the ANI opt… Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)