[netext] Logical Interface document - Reviews

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BEB1A0DAC for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:51:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MsMiAyEVdNfd for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FF21A0974 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:51:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1329; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393840268; x=1395049868; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=lB3hOo5H6M0IF62/DkRGlQk1iuRtboVKUfbdFh7iatI=; b=gfkdgkWZuE7gqCFo8kZR8fjUWf2g6U3umoPkTXZlhKjmQgQ/Hg7fhIIo E3JHNDh4PAqiHE+D7nOjeOUeMPYpGxvyVo+124l+UJm7S0oE2N9GTpWE+ +WcvrKMXmbmm3rJJ80j1tbsY9FcmLDqbrMNWm54JODKnJM+WZ1LaPNKPO U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAAhQFFOtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABagwaBEsBOgR4WdIIsOlEBPkIlAgQTh3mcUK9vF45ghDgEmDySK4Mtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,576,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="24437925"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2014 09:51:07 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s239p70Y010680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 09:51:07 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.138]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 03:51:07 -0600
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Logical Interface document - Reviews
Thread-Index: AQHPNsYZ9CideX7TzkeRBOPQat7AVA==
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:51:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CF39901D.11CA1B%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF1FFD0A.1147A2%sgundave@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.79.76]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5577AC1BDD16A24AAE6B23078BC47444@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/KCFBt6Z4b3SvM1ZaRsBA5hmoESg
Subject: [netext] Logical Interface document - Reviews
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:51:12 -0000

Folks,

Please review the Logical interface document and provide any comments. We
have addressed all the open issues and we plan to close this work very
soon.


Regards
Sri


On 2/11/14 4:27 PM, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> wrote:

>Hi Carlos,
>
>> BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
>>draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we should also close
>>that document.
>
>Absolutely. We need to close this work. Here is the document status.
>
>- There were around 6  technical issues that were reported in the issue
>tracker
>- We have discussed those issues some time back during the meeting and
>presented the fixes. The AD (Jari) at that time also was present during
>the presentation and agreed with the fixes
>- We addresses those comments and updated the draft. Julien had additional
>comments and that held the draft for a while
>- In the last rev, we addresses Julien's comments (in fact it was his
>text) that we adopted
>
>AFAIK, there is no open issue that the Authors are aware off. Raj wanted
>to do a detailed review and provide some text/updates. Once we get that
>feedback, we can WGLC.
>
>I think we need some good reviews on the draft to ensure the WG is
>comfortable with the quality of the document.
>
>
>
>
>
>Regards
>Sri
>