IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Interest to review the Logical Interface ID

"Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)" <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com> Thu, 31 July 2014 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92251A0377 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7ctGIxM1d04 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918F21A036F for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s6V70Ras031854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:00:27 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s6V70QZh018784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:00:26 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC011.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.42) by DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:00:21 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX008.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.8.152]) by DEMUHTC011.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:00:21 +0200
From: "Riegel, Maximilian (NSN - DE/Munich)" <maximilian.riegel@nsn.com>
To: ext Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>, "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Interest to review the Logical Interface ID
Thread-Index: AQHPrFscTKKvVctEEkWt/h/nMJ6nE5u5uwhQ
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:00:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CE3022AA8028FE4BA38A31768F1716BA06293634@DEMUMBX008.nsn-intra.net>
References: <CAB_pk7CWNT_M=B+qtDsjVoGGWuDuP-k04-Fvr4kQBQJqxJ6jaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB_pk7CWNT_M=B+qtDsjVoGGWuDuP-k04-Fvr4kQBQJqxJ6jaA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.124]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE3022AA8028FE4BA38A31768F1716BA06293634DEMUMBX008nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 9726
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1406790027-000005B1-15288876/0/0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/OkN7t4uNz3M1iTBBs2sjZpKtYtc
Subject: Re: [netext] Interest to review the Logical Interface ID
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:00:32 -0000

Dear Rajeev,

Only very recently by a presentation in the IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG I became aware of this I-D. When going through the text I got information which would have been extremely valuable in discussions with mobile operators nearly two years ago explaining why installation of S2a in the network is not providing the seamless connectivity between Wi-Fi and cellular they were desperately seeking for. I must admit it was a difficult discussion as not many people have good understanding of this borderline between layer 2 and layer 3.

Said this, I believe the document is important to be completed and published as RFC. ‘completed’ because IMHO the I-D is not yet comprehensive enough. If you are willing to proceed with the document I would be willing to spend a few hours more on it and provide a more comprehensive review.

Bye
Max

From: netext [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Rajeev Koodli
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 03:02
To: netext@ietf.org
Subject: [netext] Interest to review the Logical Interface ID


Hi,

as discussed at the Toronto meeting, we are looking for at least three people who are interested in reviewing the ID: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-09

Please respond if you are interested, and Cc the chairs: netext-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:netext-chairs@ietf.org>

Thanks.

-Rajeev

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email