IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt

BOC Michael <michael.boc@cea.fr> Mon, 16 July 2012 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.boc@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C16521F86BA; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.251, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVO6EigyKqVt; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6928C21F86B9; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id q6G9Cw0Z009448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:12:58 +0200
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6G9CwqA011435; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:12:58 +0200 (envelope-from michael.boc@cea.fr)
Received: from excah-b0.intra.cea.fr (excah-b0.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.85]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id q6G9CvlK003869; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:12:57 +0200
Received: from EXDAG0-B3.intra.cea.fr ([fe80::d0da:1b48:7560:ee73]) by excah-b0.intra.cea.fr ([fe80::7542:b9de:5cc1:f613%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:12:57 +0200
From: BOC Michael <michael.boc@cea.fr>
To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>, "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNYvKCvhAGL3znHEuOVmE7wTRHpJcrmk7g
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:12:56 +0000
Message-ID: <94D2EEADE1F74740979E8041CBA339380355A4EB@EXDAG0-B3.intra.cea.fr>
References: <20120716012903.13491.99397.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120716012903.13491.99397.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [132.166.88.106]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.4211-6.800.1017-19042.002
x-tm-as-result: No--32.581400-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:12:16 -0000

Hello all,

Concerning this draft, I would like to know why you need to set the R flag in PBU 
(because you don't explain it in the draft) and if your approach is to not take 
into account possible hints in IA_PD(s). If this is the case, we just have to provide 
MNP(s) at MR attachment with the HNP(s) and we move on another subject.   

Regards,


Michael


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] De la
> part de internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Envoyé : lundi 16 juillet 2012 03:29
> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc : netext@ietf.org
> Objet : [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions
> Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Prefix Delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6
> 	Author(s)       : Xingyue Zhou
>                           Jouni Korhonen
>                           Carl Williams
>                           Sri Gundavelli
>                           Carlos J. Bernardos
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 16
> 	Date            : 2012-07-15
> 
> Abstract:
>    Proxy Mobile IPv6 enables IP mobility for a host without requiring
>    its participation in any mobility signaling, being the network
>    responsible for managing IP mobility on behalf of the host.
> However,
>    Proxy Mobile IPv6 does not support assigning a prefix to a router
> and
>    managing its IP mobility.  This document specifies an extension to
>    Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol for supporting network mobility using
>    DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03
> 
> A diff from previous version is available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email