[netext] Fwd: Netext WG summary from IETF85
Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> Mon, 12 November 2012 12:35 UTC
Return-Path: <bpatil1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB9321F84FA for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:35:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxh03pOG1oQr for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:35:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F4721F84CD for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so9882460iec.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/vTrHT+rL2l0kELQwBbB3bEU3dm6KLoQlr0PoO1+mVM=; b=sP4bJSQHMh9EUpBaloeVqQ8y/AUqQSDAgJuKFUbc+Iv1xz7RIcwAvZLRVw0qVdmJ7n vE13hE3gh/AYlydnmTe9/UN++KBufdW5317mUZhiWuSlwhYgjrOauXPyOFCJsNLEH1pb lj1sDB9PBllJPJ8eMsv8Z1cRLIFzSpzI1LlcYmAWwvkG64jnSH2UVWkkDvtF42iDXefE KS5o3JDnUKF/MbtiLwJSCq+oJP4Gw4aQFh7fLSxLbc+ie5bOGZ0Bb5TSDWWORPIsQPkQ zKLTwq5vXAf97GgffgloEQwv02H7+Gqd+daV9Rdjash/Fvwj8+jqwIqhisiLUt3+EWDs X2dQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.213.73 with SMTP id nq9mr7818152igc.27.1352723711156; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.101.197 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5F1T0FEgM=L2LrPbVFDDjGqW9qChuJ5aShS4BtZ5+gQGDuNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA5F1T0FEgM=L2LrPbVFDDjGqW9qChuJ5aShS4BtZ5+gQGDuNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:35:11 -0600
Message-ID: <CAA5F1T3T1mwQCJm+W=NNhs1QZg3A4Cx+X1_6MzY83YwNQzYxRw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
To: netext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae93405f348633204ce4b8840"
Subject: [netext] Fwd: Netext WG summary from IETF85
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:35:22 -0000
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:19 PM Subject: Netext WG summary from IETF85 To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, int-ads@tools.ietf.org Cc: netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org Hi Brian, Please find below the Netext WG summary from IETF85. Rgds, -Raj Summary of Netext WG meeting at IETF85 -------------------------------------- The Netext WG met at IETF85 on Monday November 5th from 1520-1720 PM. The meeting was chaired by Basavaraj Patil. Rajeev Koodli was unable to attend this meeting because of his travel to Europe for another critical business meeting. The WG has made progress in the last 3 months and has published two RFCs (6705 and 6757). The I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option is now awaiting IESG approval. Additionally the I-D: draft-ietf-netext-rfc5149bis has completed WG last call and will be sent to the IESG shortly. The working group I-D which specifies the logical interface was discussed at the meeting. There is still more work that needs to be done on this document. There is a fundamental difference of opinion on what this document really needs to capture and specify especially given that it is an informational specification. Authors and chairs will work on this and attempt to make progress. The flow mobility specification I-D (draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob) has been revised by Carlos Bernardos (Editor). However there are still some concerns by a WG member. We will setup an issue tracker for this I-D and resolve the issues through reviews and WG consensus. The prefix delegation I-D (draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip) is ready for submission and it will go to WG last call after the meeting. The QoS for PMIP6 I-D (draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos) also needs further reviews and updates. There are a lot of open questions and issues with this I-D at the moment. The authors mentioned that this I-D is also relevant to 3GPP specifications. Chairs think that more clarity is needed in terms of how QoS signaling is done with PMIP6 messages. Several new proposals were also put forth for consideration before the WG. The I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications proposes a method by which the LMA can send unsolicited messages to the MAG to change the status of a session or do other administrative things. This I-D is also needed by 3GPP and the 3GPP liason (Atle) has sent a request to the AD and the WG chairs. There is consensus in the WG to adopt this I-D. Chairs will do a consensus call on the mailing list and then move forward. A response to Atle (3GPP liason) will be proposed to Brian (AD) by the chairs. Other proposals including the applicability of QoS in a WiFi environment as well as Mobile MAG were discussed. Many of these are preliminary and will need more discussion and convincing on the mailing list before they can be considered. At the present time the working group is making good progress and there are no major concerns. -- Basavaraj Patil
- [netext] Fwd: Netext WG summary from IETF85 Basavaraj Patil