[netext] Comments on I-D: draft-wakikawa-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation

Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bpatil1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE5B21F9DBA for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjV5mS0fQRBc for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com (mail-oa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F60821F9302 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n10so1617827oag.0 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/8HeFPHFCFT4/whubPfUS7Vojzxh3sMG1EIVSrbKCcQ=; b=fGpuYMoGxQPQE7Uz86xz405oFXwGuXQMHEFwRTZvksOur/IjNYOh7Fd4O+kT1bFNJe AOv/uXiaYNv1Y57gWVdwm3jbzRzKkOIlqAIiYLT3ZLkQ5vD77cBEMyYjW1w9TB0YD64M n1MK+FniLDPlubMrnJQi+J+FzTOdP4k/i+BnCwF05bUOt2J7PJI+G2oeHdJpalBznZZW ajPr4Q8pY84U0ImqMkYoocKihpE4N+Nsn/yCVbQ6S3RonTqfOyeB5b5V2oBkDNA61Rdi WZBNHUfo3p/fScTTtVvxE8AVOn3Kmt9d2BnKGiU2i8YdAK/tYKApxbcFYKXcri7cib6L l7eA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id q6mr4103209oew.98.1374013415918; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:23:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA5F1T0YkB27D10J6xSiJ4tF=sSKu2ifRcQrJaUOGw3f8aJL+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d3e092937b04e1a86d46
Cc: draft-wakikawa-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [netext] Comments on I-D: draft-wakikawa-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:23:37 -0000

Hi Ryuji,

The idea of splitting the CP and UP for PMIP6 has been around for quite a
In fact if I were to recollect, Vijay D. had proposed this during the
development of the PMIP6 protocol in Netlmm.

Its a good idea to allow the protocol to optionally have a separate CP/UP
between the MAG and LMA. It would essentially be equivalent to 3GPPs GTP-C
and GTP-U.

The draft itself is preliminary and hopefully will be improved if the WG
decides to adopt it.
Looking forward to the presentation/discussion in Berlin.


Basavaraj Patil