[Netext] PMIPv6 local routing

Hi Marco, Qin,

Please see inline some minor comments...

El vie, 12-06-2009 a las 09:45 +0200, Marco Liebsch escribi?:
> Hi Qin,
> 
> please see inline.
> 
> Qin Wu schrieb:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> according to the feedback the current version of the localized routing 
> >> problem
> >> statement seems to cover almost all aspects which are relevant for the
> >> NetExt work on localized routing.
> >> Two remaining aspects have been addressed, which should be considered in
> >> an update of the draft to be in line with the WG's view. These are as 
> >> follows:
> >>
> >> *Localized Routing between a PMIP attached MN and a regular IPv6 node*:
> >> This was a comment from Carlos and addresses the type of nodes
> >> RFC5213 mentions in a few paragraphs about local routing. We could clarify
> >> this offline and better text about what RFC5213 describes and how this
> >> impacts NetExt work on localized routing will go into an update of the PS.
> >>     
> >
> > [Qin]: It is  a interesting issue. What scenario do we need to think about?
> > Suppose the CN is a regular IPv6 node without PMIP protocol support,
> > It seems difficult to utitlize any PMIP6 protocol to estalish direct Path between the CN
> > and the MAG which the MN attaches to. Based on this, only one scenario occur to me is 
> > one mobile node and one regualr IPv6 node attahes to the same MAG. Is there any other scenario I miss?
> > if someone can do some clarification, it would be helpful.
> >   
> The isse raised by Carlos was actually referring to the text in RFC5213, 
> as this can be understood
> as localized routing on a single MAG between a PMIPv6-attached MN and a 
> regular IPv6
> node rather than between two PMIPv6-attached nodes. We'll need to update 
> the text in the PS accordingly
> to cover the 'state of the art'. But according to chairs, the scope of 
> NetExt covers solely localized routing
> between two PMIPv6-attached nodes. And I think this makes sense, as 
> handling localized routing with
> a regular IPv6 node can be easily handled as long as both nodes are 
> attached to the same AR/MAG, but

Agree. I don't know where it should be done (netext, netlmm), but it
might be good to standardise a solution for that (it'd be very simple).

> as soon as one node hands over to a different AR, there is much more to 
> be done to maintain localized routing
> between these nodes. So, I think the limitation in NetExt is acceptable.

Agree.

Thanks,

Carlos

> 
> marco
> 
> 
> >   
> >> *Consideration of IPv4*:
> >> This is a good point made by Sangjin and the PS should cover an analysis
> >> of relevant issues with IPv4 for PMIPv6 localized routing. There is 
> >> valuable
> >> early work available, such as draft-jeong-netlmm-pmipv6-roreq-01 and
> >> draft-wu-netext-pmipv6-ipv4-ro-ps-00. 
> >>     
> >
> > [Qin];Thank you for your initiating this discussion, it is helpful for us to move the PMIPv6 local routing work forward .
> >
> > I think it makes sense to send a
> >   
> >> separate mail to collect different aspects of IPv4 problems in PMIPv6
> >> localized routing and to discuss individual issues we need to cover in
> >> the PS.
> >>
> >> marco
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NetExt mailing list
> >> NetExt at mail.mobileip.jp
> >> http://www.mobileip.jp/mailman/listinfo/netext
> >>     
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetExt mailing list
> NetExt at mail.mobileip.jp
> http://www.mobileip.jp/mailman/listinfo/netext
-- 
   Carlos Jes?s Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
   GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                IEEE Network Special Issue on
        Advances in Vehicular Communications Networks
 http://www.comsoc.org/livepubs/ni/info/cfp/cfpnetwork0110.htm 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Esta parte del mensaje est? firmada	digitalmente
URL: <http://www.mobileip.jp/pipermail/netext/attachments/20090612/62f9c2f2/attachment.bin>

[Netext] PMIPv6 local routing - update of the PS