[netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration
<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Mon, 17 October 2011 20:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C1D21F8B7B for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7v5vVSNThyZz for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6893721F8B79 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh101.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.22]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p9HKmAWj023521; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:11 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.6]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:06 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.59) by NOK-am1MHUB-02.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:48:05 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.208]) by 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.59]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.002; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:48:05 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: netext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration
Thread-Index: AQHMjQ4RrdC/zZ4Hw0OiAXKsx+HFaA==
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:48:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAC1FEBD.12329%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.25]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2785A5B81C7A7240A48BF2E38042E39E@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2011 20:48:06.0209 (UTC) FILETIME=[123F2B10:01CC8D0E]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:48:14 -0000
Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-06 s/so to perform/so as to perform s/so some of relevant protocol operations can be performed on the entire group/in order to allow relevant protocol operations to be performed on the entire group. s/The document/This document s/will be the amount of /will the amount of Comment: "A mobile access gateway when sending a Proxy Binding Update message can request the local mobility anchor to assign a group identifier for the mobile node's mobility session." You might want to clarify that this is done for an MN which is performing initial attachment and for which there does not exist any mobility session yet. s/the message confirm /the message conform Comment: " Any time the local mobility anchor detects that the mobile node has roamed and changed its point of attachment to a new mobile access gateway, it SHOULD also update the group identifier of the mobility session. " If the LMA detects that an MN has attached to a different MAG it MUST delete the entry from the previous group. And subsequently update the GID if one has been assigned as a result of attachment to the new MAG. The security section does not address the threats arising from the ability to perform bulk operations. Suggest further enhancing the security considerations section to include concerns about bulk operations. -Raj
- [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Review of I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bul… Sri Gundavelli