[netext] #1: Behavior of ND

"netext issue tracker" <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 02 March 2011 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639313A67D9 for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:04:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXM8DePSwtcU for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD323A67B5 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1PuuAa-00048x-IZ; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:05:20 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: netext issue tracker <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: telemaco.melia@alcatel-lucent.com, basavaraj.patil@nokia.com
X-Trac-Project: netext
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:05:20 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/netext/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/1
Message-ID: <066.e9f936f62456f0a0d9c6a916f3c93be2@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 1
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: telemaco.melia@alcatel-lucent.com, basavaraj.patil@nokia.com, draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support@tools.ietf.org, netext@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:08:40 -0800
Cc: netext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [netext] #1: Behavior of ND
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:04:26 -0000

#1: Behavior of ND

 At IETF79 there was a concern identified that the I-D did not clearly
 explain the behavior of ND in the case of the logical interface on a host.
 Please propose text that addresses this concern.

-- 
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  basavaraj.patil@…          |       Owner:  telemaco.melia@…                 
     Type:  defect                     |      Status:  new                              
 Priority:  major                      |   Milestone:                                   
Component:  logical-interface-support  |     Version:  1.0                              
 Severity:  Active WG Document         |    Keywords:  ND                               
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/1>
netext <http://tools.ietf.org/netext/>