Re: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMM DTSolution VsAsolutionbased on MIP6

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

Hi Fred,

on 2006-10-27 23:07 Templin, Fred L said the following:
> Hello Henrik,
> 
>> What's really relevant to the Internet Engineering Task Force is what
>> the requirements are, and how well the proposed solution(s) fulfil the
>> requirements.  That's engineering.
>>
>> Can we get back to doing engineering, please?
> 
> In my 10/23/06 netlmm post, I asked:
> 
>   "So do we really need a new protocol for NETLMM, or would
>   it be better to take some of the nice features from the
>   DT work and fold them into a DHCP(bis) effort? (Or, can
>   we just use existing DHCP mechanisms as a "good-enough"
>   solution?)"
> 
> and, those were intended as engineering questions and not
> bickering as to why the DT didn't pick my favorite solution.

Right.  And I didn't take your post as bickering; sorry if I came
across as generalizing to that effect.

> That is why I abstained from the ballot; I am not saying no
> to the DT work - only that there are engineering questions
> left to discuss.

Perfectly acceptable, to my point of view.


Regards,

	Henrik




_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm