Re: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMM DT Solution Vs A solution based on MIP6

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Marco, I was surprised to see you as a co-author in the netlmm DT
> solution (draft-giaretta) which has 8 authors! netlmm DT solution is
> addressing a network layer problem. I do not buy the arguments that
> we found a transport level solution and our solution is thus IP
> version agnostic. First of all if you are designing a new transport
> protocol you are in the wrong WG, you should go to the transport
> area. Secondly transport protocols are end-to-end. netlmm DT solution
> is a network layer protocol, just look at sections that talk about
> link local addresses, forwarding broadcast packets, etc. It just
> combines IPv6 and IPv4 operation in one document.

Is MIP4 a network-layer or a transport layer protocol?  It uses UDP.

Is DS-MIPv6 network-layer or transport layer?  It uses UDP when
traversing NAT or IPv4.

Alex

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm