IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netlmm] Last Call: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions (Interactions betweenPMIPv6 and MIPv6: scenarios and related issues) to Informational RFC

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 18 May 2010 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A957C3A6823; Tue, 18 May 2010 00:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.217, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7+2NtoL-7DO; Tue, 18 May 2010 00:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD823A6833; Tue, 18 May 2010 00:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0332CED2; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:58:23 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QDlA-1ahy6Fk; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:58:23 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A622CCCF; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:58:23 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4BF2489F.90706@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:58:23 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>, "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
References: <20100503142438.991523A6CF2@core3.amsl.com> <4BDF35E5.1050500@earthlink.net> <057632CE4CE10D45A1A3D6D19206C3A32679D3A7DF@NASANEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> <4BF17382.3050008@earthlink.net> <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B91E97558984@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B91E97558984@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "netlmm@ietf.org" <netlmm@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Last Call: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions (Interactions betweenPMIPv6 and MIPv6: scenarios and related issues) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 07:58:34 -0000

I support what Vidya said about opening that one issue. However, I think 
we should address Charlie's other comments.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email