Re: [netlmm] WGLC: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib

["Glenn M. Keeni" <[e-mail]>]

Dirk,
    Thanks - we will fix the nits in the next version.
Cheers

Glenn

[e-mail] wrote:
> Dear Jonne, all,
> 
> you are right - perhaps, as it is a formal document - only some very
> formal comments on nits I detected (i.e. no serious concern or outcry
> from my side ;-) ) :
> 
> Both 'Acknowledgement' (e.g. p. 27, 34) and 'Acknowledgment' (all
> others) used throughout the draft
> PMIPv6 referenced as both [PMIPv6] (p. 3) and as [RFC5213] (p. 3 - 59)
> Missing 'space' on p. 4 (specification[RFC3775])
> References [RFC4831], [RFC2863] on p. 3, [RFC4295] on p. 4, [RFC-4282]
> on p. 7, [RFC-4283] on p. 26 ... => missing in ch. 8
> 
> And even the least on p. 59: 
> 'Support in IPv6 RFC 3775, June 2004.' instead of 'Support in IPv6 RFC
> 3775,  June 2004.'
> 'and Patil, B., Proxy Mobile IPv6, RFC 5213' instead of 'and Patil, B.
> Proxy Mobile IPv6), RFC 5213' 
> 'Network Addresses, RFC 4001, February 2005.' instead of 'Network
> Addresses, RFC4001, February 2005.'
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Dirk 
> 
> 
> Von: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] Im Auftrag
> von Soininen, Jonne (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 14:50
> An: Jonne Soininen; [e-mail]
> Betreff: Re: [netlmm] WGLC: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Today the last call is going to end on this. I think MIBs are a bit
> different than other documents, and if there is no outcry on the
> wrongness
> of the document, we might just see that this passes the last call.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jonne.
> 
> 
> On 11/19/09 11:19 AM, "Jonne Soininen" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> The pmip6 MIB has been available and stable for quite some time.
> Therefore I
>> would like to start the last call on the draft.
>>
>> Last Call: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib
>> Starts: Now
>> Ends: December 3rd, 2009, end of business in Pacific time zone.
>>
>> Please, read the document and send your comments to the list.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jonne.
>