[netlmm] FW: Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6
"Magesh Shanmugam" <mshanmugam@intellinet-india.com> Mon, 18 August 2008 14:29 UTC
Return-Path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netlmm-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netlmm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547733A6BB4; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF4828C120 for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.327
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.650, BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1W3g3fOwIjJq for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ricky.india.internal.net (unknown [59.145.147.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDD13A6ACC for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Magesh (magesh.india.internal.net.16.172.in-addr.arpa [172.16.8.41] (may be forged)) by ricky.india.internal.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m7IETBH5017333 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:59:11 +0530
Message-Id: <200808181429.m7IETBH5017333@ricky.india.internal.net>
From: Magesh Shanmugam <mshanmugam@intellinet-india.com>
To: netlmm@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:09:27 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: Acj9GE+ZER+VegrkTPm7PilyoTtTAwAV4gZQABgCX0AAyfGX4AASITnw
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-Cyberoam-Version: 9.5.3.22
X-Cyberoam-smtpxy-version: 0.0.3.0
X-Cyberoam-AV-Status: Clean
X-Cyberoam-Proto: SMTP
X-Cyberoam-AV-Policy: None
X-Cyberoam-AS-Policy: Global Spam Policy
Subject: [netlmm] FW: Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org
Resending the e-mail. S Magesh -----Original Message----- From: Magesh Shanmugam [mailto:mshanmugam@intellinet-india.com] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:09 AM To: 'Vijay Devarapalli' Cc: 'netlmm@ietf.org' Subject: RE: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Vijay The draft I'm referring is draft-han-netlmm-fast-pmipv6-00. Thanks S Magesh -----Original Message----- From: Vijay Devarapalli [mailto:vijay@wichorus.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11:41 PM To: Magesh Shanmugam Subject: RE: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Hi Magesh, You have to mention which draft you are talking about. It is not clear. Vijay > -----Original Message----- > From: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:netlmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magesh Shanmugam > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:44 AM > To: netlmm@ietf.org > Subject: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6 > > Hi Han, Park > > I have some queries on the fast handover scheme in PMIPv6. > The scenario you > have mentioned is for a handover to happen between MAG's interacting > with one LMA. > > Query 1: > What is the difference between normal PBU/PBA and fast PBU/PBA. Is > that the fast PBU will have a new mobility option, new PCoA and also > will have a new flag to differentiate with normal PBU/PBA. > > Query 2: > How does the PMAG knows the new PCoA (i.e. new MAG's address). In the > draft it is mentioned that through the new AP ID, we will get the new > MAG's address. Can you please detail it more. > > Query 3: > What is the action at PMAG, once it receives Fast PBA. Is it going to > delete the Binding Update List maintained for the Mobile Node, which > has moved to NMAG. > > Query 4: > What is the Handoff Type Indicator in the Fast PBU message sent by > PMAG? > > Query 5: > What is the Handoff Type Indicator in the Reverse PBU message sent by > LMA? > > Query 6: > If there is a possibility that a Mobile Node moves from one MAG > (interacting with LMA1) to another MAG (interacting with LMA2), how > should be the behavior of LMA's with respect to the fast handover. > > Query 7: > Which entity is going to decide the lifetime of the new binding > created between NMAG and LMA? > > Thanks > S Magesh > > _______________________________________________ > netlmm mailing list > netlmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm > _______________________________________________ netlmm mailing list netlmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
- [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy… Magesh Shanmugam
- Re: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in P… Magesh Shanmugam
- [netlmm] FW: Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in P… Magesh Shanmugam