IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6

"Magesh Shanmugam" <mshanmugam@intellinet-india.com> Thu, 14 August 2008 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netlmm-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netlmm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71193A6923; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330273A63CB for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sUiYnCwp6+Dx for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ricky.india.internal.net (unknown [59.145.147.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9B53A67F3 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Magesh (magesh.india.internal.net.16.172.in-addr.arpa [172.16.8.41] (may be forged)) by ricky.india.internal.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m7E5TTH5020605; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:59:29 +0530
Message-Id: <200808140529.m7E5TTH5020605@ricky.india.internal.net>
From: Magesh Shanmugam <mshanmugam@intellinet-india.com>
To: 'Vijay Devarapalli' <vijay@wichorus.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:08:52 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
Thread-Index: Acj9GE+ZER+VegrkTPm7PilyoTtTAwAV4gZQABgCX0A=
In-Reply-To: <DE33046582DF324092F2A982824D6B0303EF2050@mse15be2.mse15.exchange.ms>
X-Cyberoam-Version: 9.5.3.22
X-Cyberoam-smtpxy-version: 0.0.3.0
X-Cyberoam-AV-Status: Clean
X-Cyberoam-Proto: SMTP
X-Cyberoam-AV-Policy: None
X-Cyberoam-AS-Policy: Global Spam Policy
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:16:52 -0700
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

Vijay

The draft I'm referring is draft-han-netlmm-fast-pmipv6-00.

Thanks
S Magesh 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vijay Devarapalli [mailto:vijay@wichorus.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11:41 PM
To: Magesh Shanmugam
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6

Hi Magesh,

You have to mention which draft you are talking about. It is not clear. 

Vijay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:netlmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magesh Shanmugam
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:44 AM
> To: netlmm@ietf.org
> Subject: [netlmm] Queries on Fast Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6
> 
> Hi Han, Park
> 
> I have some queries on the fast handover scheme in PMIPv6.  
> The scenario you
> have mentioned is for a handover to happen between MAG's interacting 
> with one LMA.
> 
> Query 1:
> What is the difference between normal PBU/PBA and fast PBU/PBA.  Is 
> that the fast PBU will have a new mobility option, new PCoA and also 
> will have a new flag to differentiate with normal PBU/PBA.
> 
> Query 2:
> How does the PMAG knows the new PCoA (i.e. new MAG's address).  In the 
> draft it is mentioned that through the new AP ID, we will get the new 
> MAG's address.  Can you please detail it more.
> 
> Query 3:
> What is the action at PMAG, once it receives Fast PBA.  Is it going to 
> delete the Binding Update List maintained for the Mobile Node, which 
> has moved to NMAG.
> 
> Query 4:
> What is the Handoff Type Indicator in the Fast PBU message sent by 
> PMAG?
> 
> Query 5:
> What is the Handoff Type Indicator in the Reverse PBU message sent by 
> LMA?
> 
> Query 6:
> If there is a possibility that a Mobile Node moves from one MAG 
> (interacting with LMA1) to another MAG (interacting with LMA2), how 
> should be the behavior of LMA's with respect to the fast handover.
> 
> Query 7:
> Which entity is going to decide the lifetime of the new binding 
> created between NMAG and LMA?
> 
> Thanks
> S Magesh
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> 

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email