IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netlmm] timestamp vs seqno redux

Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net> Fri, 07 September 2007 12:19 UTC

Return-path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITco8-0002B6-LE; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:19:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITco7-00024g-M8 for netlmm@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:19:31 -0400
Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.226]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITco6-0007Uv-Dn for netlmm@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:19:31 -0400
Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 31so132346huc for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; bh=CoAMMYHqYhM6kBEaOPF6bA6sumUPLFYP2trrHPv1ZrE=; b=WpW4es8otCFMhF/fq48Hhli9ilzlVMhCE+jP85XwWzRhJsyU32DQj0kQkT6sMWy5tC9YZ+hIg4i7tNzRmtmTnApGj0DBtsIgyvadJTDT6qSno+RwbezuxOxxV2S+zuP0EYHYfxXVKZiJzsBLCKNvCPEQZ2AHQ2Sh9yi8nuqAqQg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=e7jmevRMB8ZIYq5t8VkaeURlNadCqJ+vAVVXlJfkbG6gmr/GM9CzziMCHvPyq83HF3Z0+hBQ2jjZ0kmbDIsya4nZnLVDR6WJVSFMJ3JKVpGY2TSKSVUKal36SJEIAS/s5K3RfmohT9CS+e/s7wh/jSw9yvRjvuHKIZLGYpdK9uk=
Received: by 10.86.82.16 with SMTP id f16mr1380080fgb.1189167569079; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klee.local ( [212.119.9.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm3222736nfv.2007.09.07.05.19.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net>
To: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netlmm] timestamp vs seqno redux
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:19:23 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <46DFC1C7.9060103@gmail.com> <01dc01c7f0c0$3e238210$d4f6200a@amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <01dc01c7f0c0$3e238210$d4f6200a@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200709071419.24046.julien.IETF@laposte.net>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8ac499381112328dd60aea5b1ff596ea
Cc:
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

On Thursday 06 September 2007, Sri Gundavelli wrote:
> Implementation MUST support Timestamp option: [Yes/No]

YES.

--julien

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email