Re: [netlmm] RE: NETLMM protocol document status and timelines

Hi Sri,

Please see inline.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sri Gundavelli" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "'Shyam Hemadpant'" <shyam.hemadpant@gmail.com>; <netlmm@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:48 PM
Subject: [netlmm] RE: NETLMM protocol document status and timelines

> Hi Shyam,
> 
> Please see inline ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  _____  
> 
> >  From: Shyam Hemadpant [mailto:shyam.hemadpant@gmail.com] 
> >  Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:11 PM
> > To: sgundave@cisco.com; netlmm@ietf.org
> > Subject: NETLMM protocol document status and timelines
> > 
> 
> > Hello Sri and other Authors,
> >
> >  We are doing a Proxy Mobile IPv6 implementation based on your current
> document
> >   draft-sgundave-mip6-pmip6-02.txt. Can you please tell us if your forsee
> any changes in
> >  the next revision of this document and if we need to hold off till the
> next rev comes out
> >  and if so when you plan to release the document. 
> 
> The consensus call for the document selection is complete last week and the
> formal announcement is pending.
> We the authors are working on making changes to the current document, based
> on the feedback that we received
> over the last few weeks and things that we missed in the last revision due
> to time pressure. The changes will be 
> specific to:
> 
> - Textual Comments and Nits
> - Other changes reflecting the wg consensus
> - Review comments received offline and in the ML
> - Authors discussion ..etc
> 
> Generally, the base protocol operation will not change. We will attempt to
> improve the presentation and provide
> clarity on the protocol operation, as required.
> 
> >   Can we know the estimated timelines as when this draft will become the
> proposed standard. 
> 
> The document is in a good shape with good positive feedback. Our goal is to
> send the document to
> IESG in July time frame, if things go the way they are supposed to go.
> 
> > We also need some metrics on the protocol scalability and performance to
> present to
> >  our partner and any data that you can share, will help our project. 
> 
> Cisco Japan has implemented Proxy Mobile IPv6 and we have some data on this.
> Hopefully. we will
> present this in the next IETF, if we get a slot.  Also, some university in
> Korea has the implementation, at least
> there were some implementation specific queries. 

FYI.
Currently, ETRI and KUT are jointly implementing the draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6-02. 

Regards
Sangjin

> Also, one or two other
> vendor implementations, that I don't
> know if I can comment. Any case,  we should be able to get some good data on
> this aspect from multiple sources,
> hopefully.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Sri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
>