IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Current slides

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 22 March 2019 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5625F130DE7 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nFmHl-ce8Sz3 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7E1130E8B for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D74A48AEC1BD13B7EDE2 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:54:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:54:05 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.81]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:54:01 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Current slides
Thread-Index: AdTgnYfpuoN/Di16QVio9iLKLFu4fw==
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:54:00 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B2F93BC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.64.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B2F93BCnkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/F9QgICMYP4Rl493V2OKwKOHrxCQ>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Current slides
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:54:12 -0000

Two quick comments on slides:
Page 11:  Could we link Schema Comparison Tooling to draft-wang-netmod-module-revision-management, Michale told me he has some update.
Page 21
“3.1 The solution MUST provide a mechanism to allow servers to support existing clients in a backwards-compatible way.
”
I feel this requirement may introduce some ambiguity, e.g.,whether it is protocol backwards-compatibility or model version backwards compatibility.
Would it be good to distinguish one from another.
Page 24:
Not clear what NETCONF/RESTCONF instances means? NETCONF/RESTCONF session or connection? Do we have reference for this term?
Page 23, Page 24,
Page 23 said
“
Servers are NOT required to concurrently support clients using different schema versions
”
Page 24 said:
“
Servers support configuration for secondary NETCONF/RESTCONF instances (using different port numbers) which use a different schema-set version
”
Does these two statements have some contradiction. Maye it is okay since the statement in page 23 indicate allow server to concurrently support clients.

-Qin
发件人: Netmod-ver-dt [mailto:netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
发送时间: 2019年3月21日 22:22
收件人: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
主题: [Netmod-ver-dt] Current slides

Hi,

This is hopefully the combined set of slides, if anyone would like to review them before today’s meeting.

Thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email