Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Current slides

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

Joe, thanks for clarification, it works for me now.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Joe Clarke [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2019年3月22日 17:58
收件人: Qin Wu <[e-mail]>; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Current slides

On 3/22/19 05:52, Qin Wu wrote:
> Page 4:
> Suggest the following change:
> OLD TEXT:
> "
> “The solution MUST provide a mechanism to support clients that expect an older version of a given module when the current version has had non-backwards-compatible changes.”
> "
> NEW TEXT:
> "
> “The solution MUST provide a mechanism to support clients to fall back to an older version of a given module when the current version has had non-backwards-compatible changes.”
> "

I think those are different approaches.  If the client supports the newer module, why would it need to fallback.  If it expects the older module (because it has no knowledge of the new one), then the server should allow that.

My take is that the requirement is written correctly.  That said, the slide has it the way it is currently written in the draft, so it should stay this way for the time being.

Also, I'll likely only present slide 2 and slide 6 to avoid more talk than necessary.

Joe

> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Netmod-ver-dt [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Joe 
> Clarke
> 发送时间: 2019年3月22日 0:39
> 收件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> 主题: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Current slides
> 
> On 3/21/19 10:21, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  
>>
>> This is hopefully the combined set of slides, if anyone would like to 
>> review them before today’s meeting.
> 
> Here is my updated sub-deck.  Only the last slide changed.
> 
> I'll look over the rest of the slides in a bit.
> 
> Joe
>