IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 28 May 2021 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDE73A1983; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6H9xqTBgOJ5G; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722523A1982; Thu, 27 May 2021 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FrlMG5THQz316H; Fri, 28 May 2021 02:05:46 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9054.1622159494@localhost>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 02:05:46 +0200
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, netmod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D920B316-8CA2-47F9-AC08-79CD36633C96@tzi.org>
References: <340b29f4-e867-6a5d-b45c-8c8b9e45eb47@lear.ch> <9054.1622159494@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2IaiYWXQrQk75zyNGDjq4oYwCT0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 00:06:01 -0000

On 28. May 2021, at 01:51, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
>> *  *Issue*: Should a single owner possibly have multiple license
>>     types?  (Logical or, multi-licensing.)
> 
> Uhm, so the Perl ARTISTIC license, which I think is a single license,
> is a superposition of two licenses, but it can be represented as a single
> license.  So, no.

While the Perl artistic license was a goof with a particularly high visibility, there are lots of other situations that call for multi-licensing.
So I’m not sure that Perl is even an good example here.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email