Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 27 May 2021 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEA53A18FC; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5KLewr5VpwGz; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367D53A18FE; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960ED38C50; Thu, 27 May 2021 19:51:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id V3UcAlyyoiIm; Thu, 27 May 2021 19:51:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB5038C4F; Thu, 27 May 2021 19:51:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3083FB; Thu, 27 May 2021 19:51:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, netmod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <340b29f4-e867-6a5d-b45c-8c8b9e45eb47@lear.ch>
References: <340b29f4-e867-6a5d-b45c-8c8b9e45eb47@lear.ch>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 19:51:34 -0400
Message-ID: <9054.1622159494@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/heNHdo2fMMsPglpEnBHY3tRgblg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] please see draft-lear-opsawg-ol on licensing
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 23:51:43 -0000

Some WG please adopt.
Probably that's opsawg, iotops or maybe netmod, if netmod thinks this could
be generalized easily.

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
    el> The extension is written as a grouping that is then 'used' to augment
    el> a 'mud' container.  The intent here is that if you find the need to
    el> use the extension for other purposes, you can.  I wonder if some yang
    el> doctors would like to take a look. We'd like to move on this one
    el> quickly.

It looks fine.

On the issue of multiple owners, each would have their own tag, I think that
should be supported.  So, instead of:

       "ol": {
         "owners": [
           "Copyright (c) FrobMaster 2021. All Rights Reserved"
         ],
         "spdx-tag": "0BSD"
       },

I think we need:

       "ol": [
         {
           "owner": "Copyright (c) FrobMaster 2021. All Rights Reserved"
           "spdx-tag": "0BSD"
         }
         ]
       },


> *Issue*: Should this be an owner or an originator?

If by "owner" you mean the of the device, then perhaps you mean manufacturer
or owner?   Or the initial creator of the MUD file, and then I think that
maybe "originator" might be clearer.

>   *  *Issue*: Should we simply say that a URI contains a colon and SPDX
>      license identifier doesn't?

No, I think that I'm happy with different tags.

>   *  *Issue*: Should a single owner possibly have multiple license
>      types?  (Logical or, multi-licensing.)

Uhm, so the Perl ARTISTIC license, which I think is a single license,
is a superposition of two licenses, but it can be represented as a single
license.  So, no.

>   *  *Issue*: Should we give an example for usage outside yang?

if such a situation should present itself in the next 10 weeks, sure.

>   *  *Issue*: Should we maybe point out any specific seccons of 8520?

The only issue I can see is that claiming a copyright might reveal that such
an entity has dealt with such a device.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide