IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Adoption Poll: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365BD12421A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:07:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SJA4tPUnWK9q for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:07:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6B01200C1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:07:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.45]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CEB71AE0118; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:07:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:07:47 +0100
Message-Id: <20180207.090747.1266359942414260960.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: joelja@bogus.com
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <cab2618d-4c59-b516-0590-f7e3d1936f50@bogus.com>
References: <cab2618d-4c59-b516-0590-f7e3d1936f50@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/7wWWx8b2pyZzgovnKY9_31myofs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption Poll: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 08:07:51 -0000

Hi,

I support this document as a working group document.

I do have some things to discuss, e.g., should we try to use a
decentralized approach to tags instead of the proposed IANA registry
(as it happens we have a mechanism for decentralized, hierarchical
identifiers available :)   One use case that I would like to solve is
tagging of mutually exclusive sets of modules, e.g., ietf vs
openconfig vs native models.


/martin



joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is the start of a *two* week poll on making
> draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 a working group document.  
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02
> 
> This document was most recently discussed at IETF 100.
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
> to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> This poll ends on February 8.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Joel Jaeggli and IETF NETMOD Co-Chairs
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email