IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] BBF work depending on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01

William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org> Thu, 15 December 2016 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9960B129BA9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:02:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfCA6QX5UweR for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B90129B30 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6DB1E5669; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 3GM9yuNWU_zs; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.129] (host5-81-223-185.range5-81.btcentralplus.com [5.81.223.185]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09E831E5667; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
In-Reply-To: <f892d895-a21c-d1fe-8597-ab07b12bd272@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:01:58 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <88C30E13-A7DF-4919-9BCC-3969E2E6AF11@broadband-forum.org>
References: <f53b253e-3ec1-b0b4-c82d-e6a9d0ce10f1@cisco.com> <20161215.145729.704925239472686261.mbj@tail-f.com> <f892d895-a21c-d1fe-8597-ab07b12bd272@cisco.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/CCO2pn7bW1baA8l267L_6LRmlQs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] BBF work depending on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:02:06 -0000

The current draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01 defines ietf-hardware and iana-entity modules. Is it intended that iana-entity will become iana-hardware? Thanks, W.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email