IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AAB3A0DBA; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:06:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=WHtQfAhu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=AKUtDzVA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iosmad0zrFFE; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4EE13A0DBD; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:06:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1867; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583496373; x=1584705973; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=VGFTb33z2yPEN+uflX84vSsjFiUK19KyoqCeXjG/6BY=; b=WHtQfAhubYin/ZRDgmrkAYMtdwBpsP+4foBtswfxV+MopToFhnQh9OkA q+8zao5U+qg+P08186rpr/KOrjfqj9UlmQRUKNeDLDd3Osg6WpuorXrsa i6cl40JBBsg19RhLtzGv3sE9dqjQVMo9Sutj0Cg+rNDgxZDDRlXl5hUno Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:POuJqh/KoiILJ/9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZB7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVdSaCEnnK/jCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CqBQCwO2Je/4oNJK1kHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuBVCQsBWxYIAQLKgqHUQOKaoJfmBWCUgNUCQEBAQwBARgLCgIEAQGDfkUCgg4kOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhWMBAQEBAwEBECgGAQEsCwELBAIBCBEEAQEfECcLHQgCBAENBQgagwWCSgMuAQMLnT8CgTmIYoIngn8BAQWFAxiCDAMGgTiMJxqBQT+BEUeBT34+gmQBAYFng0GCCiKNT6JWCoI8lwKCSYghkEuOdptRAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIiqBLnAVO4JsUBgNjh0MF4NQhRSFQXSBKYwVAYEPAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,522,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="739999598"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Mar 2020 12:06:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 026C6CGW024055 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:06:12 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 06:06:12 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 06:06:11 -0600
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:06:11 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Eo3Ntt5UJGkkzcHdkhzlYIjvQQfTZnXk/UkA0XGzbZwjLndN1zvJvTcfezZd8oaMl4bfkBFzK+Sn+WBBBhRX7Q2XVARfs3s6LBKNSpIfdpnnKEo45ey1mfMw6kQXo7xmakf8bpPEJ61GK18ew6qRrnQZ9M9k+04Ct17ZKfIXelDoxCtzNfKBAJD/O3d0rqkVBA3nl6fLAOrD0x+l3XQBcLST0tcVmayv/OnxQrkQeoq2JXFGJ96h1mxCz36oTk0Mmg6DKJB+EH14yMhOh0kpxldirfi2502xQydY/tIaw9jDhzqFZ1v5z90P7gxFAtbGzFKLhsbx0iBHYDMrOF7JEw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=A2zyI8yWd9MeTpZDMZ3/Ne/9c6ruQgwyXJjreWI7Mtk=; b=abNnAx4oaJNmLVsg5vfGV+1YxwLpUaXuUxV+ITvMRzylvM4UHftiAMHLrzy0FXeXf5smMbA/0aDXdk7dSL0/E9whZCzpIGgb0Esr4CUL6nRZB4LU3PikacaWOgri0ETZXnK4mYD9j5sz8EP8hBVgHhkgdTDqQ0TbQnWE+2p/IPGdD0FoSY4Rrn4IP+o8CxFfnMZlU6+8Vjj5ZDzSayXRrQzCu+mJB3GSoQxQwxL34UUl9jLtXfyZocoPVqruvx0cpQVUxj3PpNTig7j0GwO+WAGm7cHWxytXMb0S8smj8/isVwHfl6WLILn4KxEoEjlk35dUtTRpeb7PZPAK4lwlLw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A2zyI8yWd9MeTpZDMZ3/Ne/9c6ruQgwyXJjreWI7Mtk=; b=AKUtDzVA10ubX0ubrkK8lZpQEKMwHURX+HhRfYGo9cLMt41uvnCK/luq74kFfkjRMEGPGZA4y44Ihn6M40Sh5h6j977sR1Hc+BQL9s61M/eR2HfVUY5l1aFAfoCAxmAxApX8otgIANXC0hVqyc/OMrIHNSxyK0jeK8hFa/fqkUQ=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c3::13) by BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c3::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.15; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:06:09 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5434:7127:ff4b:e6f4]) by BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5434:7127:ff4b:e6f4%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:06:09 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06
Thread-Index: AQHVxVfRoKwho9Y9mUCvGGVNaWdV1Kg70o/g
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:06:09 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4355D607AD5EEC9F5C38B0B3B5E30@BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <0100016f8006222d-b861a109-93ee-4a77-8b65-54c22d591e25-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100016f8006222d-b861a109-93ee-4a77-8b65-54c22d591e25-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.15.79.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 30f17688-b90e-4334-f736-08d7c1c6c1e1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4355:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB435579720C9392923D7E51FBB5E30@BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0334223192
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(86362001)(5660300002)(478600001)(316002)(81156014)(81166006)(4326008)(52536014)(110136005)(8676002)(2906002)(107886003)(8936002)(966005)(64756008)(76116006)(53546011)(66446008)(66476007)(9686003)(6506007)(66556008)(71200400001)(33656002)(7696005)(55016002)(66946007)(26005)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY5PR11MB4355; H:BY5PR11MB4355.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Lkqif6nb7P68bzfDp20hgUbSKiV65BGWxt2i5u+8mDofvYufV3EH//O6aHz6O6GdC/5CUdGKtINxdCYEZfsLHOtC6EpkDNh+Epzgxfx8nd0DszCFOb5TTG0sOgpXFRAdjIivXjge6STrIAAPw9wMlA==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 30f17688-b90e-4334-f736-08d7c1c6c1e1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Mar 2020 12:06:09.4902 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Lsw3mXnxD8qcAhnJnbayrgOqnwpnk5witKiefbOoXpR/BAkNj/8DNBHgupfb+huwvoDRpVoGYmI2tKpLh3HREQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4355
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/CW8duvj_P5rnCL1otOypyvnpxl4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:06:19 -0000

Hi,

Not a full WGLC review, but one comment that I have on this draft (which partly picks up a comment that Joe mentioned earlier regarding "yid-version").


I think that we should probably avoid using the term "yid-version" because "yid" can be regarded as a racial slur, perhaps "file-format-version" would be safer?

But I also agree with Joe that I think that it would be better to tie this back to the revision-date of the YANG module rather than inventing another versioning scheme.  Ideally, this would be a YANG Semver revision-label, but we don't want this draft to get delayed behind the versioning work.

Subject to the outcome of the (so far remarkably quiet) YANG versioning drafts adoption call, perhaps this leaf could instead be defined as a string, which can only currently take the value "1.0.0", thus allowing it to be extended to adopt YANG revision labels and semver in future?

Thanks,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: 07 January 2020 12:41
> To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-
> format-06
> 
> 
> This begins a two-week Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-
> netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06.  The WGLC ends on Jan 21.  Please
> send your comments to the working group mailing list.
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
> ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even
> from authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at
> this time.
> 
> Thank you,
> NETMOD Chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email