IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01

Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157E0129577; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uKqVbeB8HplK; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0097.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29110129687; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jabil-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=kImmb3kukvDzD2WvNS3bza5VE/OpTkQpFnuoe+wbNYM=; b=bIMuLY360+f316oWYsFBZRGkonL+7UkfB0PbxaCPveK3S3fpAxH8N3ktEUoZGmyTnFz9VQDTil8dBI9uomxIfG66IgJcPDnqDDS7ffMzrAPj30PxD0SvW0DynYUAkZh3PK2yKhenG6GaJNZKWLpGF7IQi+fFqpWUvXXgh+Fn1ak=
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.13) by BN3PR0201MB0868.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1178.14; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:53:32 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) by BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) with mapi id 15.01.1157.017; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:53:32 +0000
From: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
To: "draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines@ietf.org" <draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
Thread-Index: AdLke06/vgT9KziZR8agaNlzO3lZRw==
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:53:32 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR0201MB0867C18E5FF7239EE991F720F1C20@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-dg-ref: PG1ldGE+PGF0IG5tPSJib2R5Lmh0bWwiIHA9ImM6XHVzZXJzXHhsaXVcYXBwZGF0YVxyb2FtaW5nXDA5ZDg0OWI2LTMyZDMtNGE0MC04NWVlLTZiODRiYTI5ZTM1Ylxtc2dzXG1zZy1mNzYwYmVjOS01MDcxLTExZTctOWMxNC0xODVlMGZlM2M0NWNcYW1lLXRlc3RcZjc2MGJlY2EtNTA3MS0xMWU3LTljMTQtMTg1ZTBmZTNjNDVjYm9keS5odG1sIiBzej0iMjY2NiIgdD0iMTMxNDE4NTcyMDkxMzMwNDAzIiBoPSJaME9NQUZTaWxVRnBSREo0YmU5N3RDS2pySXc9IiBpZD0iIiBibD0iMCIgYm89IjEiLz48L21ldGE+
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com;
x-originating-ip: [98.191.72.170]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0201MB0868; 7:JqZMrQCWV3mAYxxp25REkwTgmuWjVfySP9IKoGqACK9mYlUshyCqg4rihEUi2JN0Cg6m2cwVh6CnqpTca55h9YB5bJfqG4qoz+rbwtlssVN0upFpao9eu8STvS9F34KmWhlEjpkKHKkHz6Wc46n4JZwxmDkjN0S9C4OF0eVA6TByZ9v6wq8iKpi29umnWWTHc7wVB443qDqlAhyso/1QXeEg2K38xsXsW0IJF8G4+XnTjUiybmNAhlcQqUFj5dIXA872G50zQjqgVo1rtV+oba06rv8u83ELK7ODRifm/uVBHjp95WScm8TjZAIOQmem9rkrGcfjmhpG20pa2jL7/g==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 18131aea-5c91-42cf-8b19-08d4b295decc
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0868;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0201MB0868:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0201MB0868558FFDF7DEB310488AD8F1C20@BN3PR0201MB0868.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0868; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0868;
x-forefront-prvs: 0337AFFE9A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39450400003)(39860400002)(39410400002)(39840400002)(39400400002)(39850400002)(199003)(189002)(189998001)(3280700002)(97736004)(2900100001)(5660300001)(80792005)(7696004)(2501003)(7736002)(25786009)(74316002)(122556002)(2906002)(72206003)(478600001)(33656002)(230783001)(14454004)(3660700001)(6436002)(6306002)(6506006)(54896002)(55016002)(86362001)(77096006)(106356001)(9686003)(3846002)(450100002)(81156014)(99286003)(53936002)(54356999)(50986999)(38730400002)(8676002)(101416001)(81166006)(8936002)(66066001)(102836003)(6116002)(105586002)(68736007)(790700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0868; H:BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: jabil.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN3PR0201MB0867C18E5FF7239EE991F720F1C20BN3PR0201MB0867_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jabil.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Jun 2017 19:53:32.1556 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bc876b21-f134-4c12-a265-8ed26b7f0f3b
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0201MB0868
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/E9i_MvjZOxgRjTcxbCGxHGVvgzc>
Subject: [netmod] Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:53:37 -0000

During discussing the adoption of this guidelines, a question came up w.r.t. the semantics of the non-NMDA "-state" module during the transitioning period:

What kind of state do the leaves in the "-state" module represent? The applied configuration or the actually used operational data?
Since only of the two types can be represented, what is the guideline to model the other type?

Thanks,
- Xufeng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email