[netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104?
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 14 January 2019 17:07 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067E31311BA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9Mn92Qf2ivu for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F7C1311B6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c19-v6so19697627lja.5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ksNqFjbFqSIRxWLvw+fHqLmBtfHOTPCT05SvTgIeGzw=; b=Rpz/55bt76GrUAzQmyAp/GBkAOGtERiM+OTkXxWgbd351pjFpb6rfX6Q6ULpDX5Gq0 pA/lU2YHA6vDETYZyF1fbs0oJ/XCyTR3ZY2qNMYd5HyNbJj38bL4weYH5XAHDVP2db6P yZX/wiGiWRS0d/MebGDZl+3mF2DcB6moW/xWD9bm7NavJ1b0FT/h/qCWEEEYaL6cCt4d T4hd6H5RYjaT+oLrYAi1F80TzM3qLz7+F/XQKptodu3jWXH5U8d8tkjzsXFTBCOiGg9f CA3DAw1ZKAt3vQIuj7pvRgNj/+/dSXg1q80L49t/7GTXZX1/zB6DzwSCQqHOp/YrofMv 5Pww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ksNqFjbFqSIRxWLvw+fHqLmBtfHOTPCT05SvTgIeGzw=; b=cMxw6YxPIe4blqr/oHSkvyZGyg5DZd0NugM4cZuUFAEOS+mnQB/FuZjLtYQdCZVkl2 vTs0iu5577Z5oDmsCGfeGefy9B0m8cR5bkM4m8Ia0OkQIS6N2LNch6lqj+lVv86XArB/ IUIXKtRhpWE+3lQBL1yabvtphAkXZj3kajza1bBNwGRc67mn134znC+EbT6hRbjwZkQk Zm9Kjn2E9wgMOP69SslUJFBnGqzy7t8LrSJ85h07zVwpAQWZVx/9Ld8e2eAnU37uCtwo HtPgzaiVHy/xvg8W4zlUHwoQ+4h1Z1TkzioE3kWj56WzUYehkt6V832chHlcmevFgxZi kdbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukegmQxuagag6MSDwaEchCxXOuDsY/hP2LonZt76IfQ1c1WluV9S FlCwBxXo56E+ik5kCwbv7oS57cu+vu7rMwebA4vKqMaN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN54Acc8VCdm4AO8Y392ZweRC8nfu/19VSEn+R6eFsinLoqK4ayKxEYn6Cm6UnbIl7cMVrkgBbFN51MC1b1zMxk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:145a:: with SMTP id 26-v6mr15017445lju.116.1547485650943; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHT-sN1n26A-Zm2N9f7VAFTdz3tzotaZ-9xHfRv-E5J0Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085291d057f6e141b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/FC_E4hOTqE4RwsRsRuSbYrAYCMI>
Subject: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:07:35 -0000
Hi, Is there any interest in 1 or more side meetings at the next IETF to discuss the yang-next issue list, towards the goal of determining the problem space in scope for YANG 1.2? Those of us who would need to make travel plans would appreciate it if meetings like this were scheduled ASAP instead of ALAP ;-) Andy
- [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] yang-next meeting at IETF 104? Reshad Rahman (rrahman)